SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cirrus who wrote (45038)10/24/2005 3:12:35 PM
From: twmoore  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362466
 
The problem with the Iraq War was not taking out Saddam, that was a good thing.

How be we just substitute the name Bush for Saddam.
The Middle East might be better off without Saddam,but the whole world would be better off without Bush's merry band of idiots.



To: cirrus who wrote (45038)10/24/2005 8:42:41 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362466
 
Right. There was no rush to take out Saddam. He was maybe #5-10 on the priority list. Bushies lied their heads off about Saddam being such a danger to us. Still he was a potential danger. It's not black and white.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News