Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (257492)	10/28/2005 9:00:21 PM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571931

I never said nuke Mecca. There was that Senator who said that we should threaten to nuke Mecca, if any of our cities were nuked by a Muslim terrorist. That seemed like a good idea to me, because there is nothing that these Muslims seem to care about. They don't care about their own lives and they don't care about the lives of children or innocents. So how do you find something that they care about to produce a kind of leverage that acts as a deterrent? Well, religion is the only thing they care about. So this senator said that we should threaten to nuke Mecca as a deterrent capability and I said it was worth considering. That is a far cry from Muslim terrorists who would nuke one of our cities just for the hell of it. Shoot, you don't even have to go looking for the terrorists anymore. They are so emboldened by the pacifists in the West, nowadays they openly display their terrorist ways. Check out the President of Iran. He is now openly calling for the absolute destruction of Israel, but our pacifists are still thinking Iran is a peaceful country not interested in acquiring nukes. How stupid is that?