SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/28/2005 11:58:20 PM
From: trouthead  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
The Clintons were innocent of all charges until the last and accidental uncovering of his sexual pecadillos with Monica. There outrage was the response of the innocent. Perhaps Libby is guilty, knows it and is ready to accept his rightful punishment.

jb



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 12:19:32 AM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Lesson learned is NEVER EVER cooperate...the police and investigators and AGs are NOT your friends and when in front of a grand jury...plead the fifth..screw them



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 1:20:39 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Good contrast.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 1:23:00 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 769667
 
Sad Sack Sheehan Cast Aside
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 10/28/05 | Rush Limbaugh

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: This is hilarious. Just to show you how fast the Democrats drop you when you become worthless. You remember back this past summer and going into the month of September, the celebrity in this country was Cindy Sheehan. She was the face of the Democratic anti-war movement. She was the face of the Democratic base. She was the person we needed to run for office, people like Cindy Sheehan. Yesterday she showed up -- I'm sorry, it was this morning -- at the National Press Club. She spoke to a nearly empty room. There were only a couple of foreign journalists there. Zilch attendance. Nobody cared that Cindy Sheehan was speaking today. She gave her opinion on possible indictments, and I guess she's as qualified as anybody else in the media to comment on this. Unidentified foreign reporter, one of two or three in the room, said, "Big news in Washington today as the grand jury is finally reaching the conclusion in its term of the Wilson affair. I was wondering how you analyze Dick Cheney's role in it."

SAD SACK: I haven't -- I've been really busy so I haven't got to like analyze a lot of things but I believe that the corruption goes all the way to the top, and that this is encouraging to me because I believe the investigations are going to continue, especially after the indictments, and that's all that we've been asking for for a long time. These indictments I think are wonderful to be able to actually to expose the lies, expose these people for what they are.

RUSH: Well, Cindy, the indictment today doesn't expose any lie about going to war, doesn't expose any lie about Valerie Plame, at least in outing her. It has nothing to do with the central theme of the case. Now, a reporter from the French News Agency, Jerome Bernard, says, "Jerome Bernard from AFP. How do you expect to keep the momentum in the coming months for your movement? What kind of actions are you planning?" Meanwhile, these questions are asked with nobody in the room. She has no momentum. She's got this guy from the agency, the French News Agency, and one other or two other reporters there, and that's it.

SAD SACK: There's several major actions coming up. On November 2nd it's national -- help me -- help me out here. It's (laughing). Drive Out the Bush Regime, the World Can't Wait. It's a national day of -- I can't think this morning. It's a national day of... strikes. Strikes and rallies and vigils.

RUSH: What a joke.

SAD SACK: The first anniversary of the last election, and that's going to -- and there's hundreds of events all over the country.

RUSH: She doesn't even know, she doesn't even know what's coming, she doesn't know what's going on, she can't tell the dates, she has no clue what's happening. This is the leader of the anti-war left who has just been cast aside and flicked away by the left as the useless creature that she is. So the Italian news agency reporter, Marco Bardazzi, says, "I want an update on your legal situation. How many times have you been arrested and what kind of legal problems do you face now? And second, are you concerned by the fact that it seems that you have much, much less media coverage now than in the past few weeks?"

SAD SACK: I don't ever want the media coverage to be on me. I've only focused -- I've only wanted to focus on being on the Iraq war, and I believe that the media in our country really also abrogated their responsibility to be checks and balances on our government, that our media sometimes only reports the press releases they get from the White House and they don't do any investigative reporting. They don't ask the hard questions.

RUSH: You know, she almost has a point here. They really don't do any investigating. They just do a bunch of supposing. They do a bunch of assuming, and then they go out and cover their assumptions as though they're reality, and they set up their agenda and their cycle, and they look through the prism of "This is the news today," and it turns out it's the news they hope happens. That's literally what it's become. Here's the news we hope to happen as though it is happening and as though it has happened, and there she is at the National Press Club saying all of this -- and she doesn't want media coverage! She doesn't want the focus to be on her, and yet she's at the National Press Club! Some people call this woman a moon bat, other people call her a dingbat. She's just a sad sack. She's been totally used. Her grief has been soaked up by a bunch of people who just want to use and exploit her, and we see here that she's just out of here league. She doesn't even know what her next protests are and what they're about. She thinks the media have constitutional checks and balance responsibilities and so forth. But this is the angel of the left, folks. This is their guiding light.

END TRANSCRIPT



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 1:25:47 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Able Danger warned of attack on USS Cole
TimesHerald ^ | 10/25/05 | KEITH PHUCAS

Senior Pentagon officials were warned not to let the USS Cole dock in Yemen two days before terrorists attacked the ship five years ago killing 17 sailors, according to Congressman Curt Weldon, who said the crucial intelligence was gleaned from the former secret defense operation, "Able Danger."

Weldon, vice chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, revealed the information in a House speech last Wednesday evening that blasted the Defense Intelligence Agency's (DIA) attempts to discredit Army Reserve Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a DIA employee who worked as a liaison with the "Able Danger" team. In June, Shaffer told The Times Herald during an interview on Capitol Hill that the now-defunct data mining operation had linked Sept. 11 hijacker Mohamed Atta to an al-Qaida cell in Brooklyn in 2000 - more than a year before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The military's Special Operations Command ran the high-tech dragnet that searched for terrorist linkages. The terrorist associations were mapped out on large charts, according to Shaffer and other of "Able Danger" colleagues, during the program that operated between 1999 and 2001.

However, following Shaffer's attempts to broker an arrangement that would draw the FBI into the operation, the program was shut down. Weldon and Shaffer believe "Able Danger" intelligence may have disrupted - or even prevented - the Sept. 11 attacks if it had continued.

In August, Navy Capt. Scott Phillpott and James D. Smith, a defense contractor, corroborated Shaffer's story. On Wednesday, Weldon again criticized the Pentagon for dragging its feet in its probe of the defense program's history, and continued his criticism of the CIA, which he said tried to protect its own intelligence turf from other government intelligence agencies.

"What we have here, I am convinced of this now, is an aggressive attempt by CIA management to cover up their own shortcomings in not being able to do what the Able Danger team did," he said. Besides claiming to identifying Atta from a grainy photograph prior to Sept. 11, the intelligence team also tried to warn the Pentagon not to allow the USS Cole to make a refueling stop in Yemen five years ago, Weldon said. On Oct. 12, 2000, a small boat loaded with explosives rammed into the side of the USS Cole as the ship refueled in port at Aden, killing the 17 Navy personnel. "(Able Danger members) also identified the threat to the USS Cole two weeks before the attack, and two days before the attack were screaming not to let the (ship) come into the harbor at Yemen, because they knew something was going to happen," he said. The "Able Danger" group operated at the Army's former Land Information Warfare Center (LIWA), in Ft. Belvoir, Va. After LIWA's intelligence gathering capability impressed Weldon, he tried to pitch the idea of a collaborative intelligence center to the CIA in 1999, but was rebuffed. Also in his speech, Weldon accused the DIA of trying to smear Shaffer rather than come clean on why "Able Danger" was shut down.

Shaffer, who was awarded a Bronze Star for his service in Afghanistan, had his top-secret security clearance suspended in 2004 allegedly because of disputes over travel expenses and phone bills. But his supporters suggest Shaffer is being made a scapegoat for going public with the "Able Danger" revelations in August. Two days before he was set to testify about the program before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 21, the Reserve officer's secret clearance was revoked, and the Defense Department barred him, Phillpott and Smith from testifying at the hearing.

Also in August, Pentagon officials told reporters at a press conference that "Able Danger" data had been deleted from computers. A former Army intelligence officer, Erik Kleinsmith, confirmed this at the Judiciary Committee hearing, testifying he was ordered to destroy information. During the life of the program, the operation's team members created charts linking terrorists.

However, during the recent investigation, none have been found. The Pentagon, which claimed it is restricted from retaining intelligence on United States citizens and foreign residents living in the U.S., so-called "U.S. persons," for more than 90 days. However, Weldon has previously said most of the program's data was open source information and not classified. According to guidelines in Army Regulation 381-10, intelligence data can be kept indefinitely if it was culled from open sources.

An unnamed "Able Danger official," Weldon said, was told by a Pentagon lawyer that it's okay to extend the time intelligence information is stored. A Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Chris Conway, said recently that Defense Department officials worried that any public testimony given about "Able Danger" risked revealing classified information.

"Prior to any testimony, we expressed our security concerns with Congress," Conway said. "We said in discussing Able Danger, (it) could inadvertently reveal classified information." Defense officials said they would allow military personnel to testify about the program behind closed doors.

Previously, Shaffer said that Atta, an Egyptian, had been linked to the El Farouq mosque in Brooklyn, N.Y., a hotbed of anti-American sentiment once frequented by Sheik Omar Ahmed Abdul Rahman, know as the "Blind Sheik." Rahman is also Egyptian. Atta was not believed to be in the U.S., however, when he came to the attention of the team.

In 1995, Rahman was convicted of plotting to bomb various sites in New York City. Four of Rahman's associates were convicted in 2002 of conspiring with him to commit terrorist acts while he was in prison.

Though Shaffer was not allowed to give testimony at the Sept. 21 committee hearing, his attorney, Mark Zaid, did testify. As a sobering reminder of "Able Danger's" unfulfilled promise, Zaid said the missing charts showing terrorist links likely still contained "several dozen" individuals yet to be captured. "There are terrorist on the chart who may still be out there and planning attacks," Zaid said.

Keith Phucas can be reached at kphucas@timesherald.com or 610-272-2500, ext. 211.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 1:38:12 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Fitzgerald says "anyone who would go into a grand jury and lie, obstruct and impede the investigation has committed a serious crime."

Somewhere, William Jefferson Clinton is banging on the bongos, puffing on a stogie, and laughing his head off.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 1:45:42 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The worst thing about Fitz's press conference is that he was nervous as hell, sweating, stumbling, and unpersuasive.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 2:18:34 AM
From: paret  Respond to of 769667
 
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean today issued the following statement:

"This is a sad day for America.

"Beyond the evidence that the White House manipulated the intelligence used to justify the war in Iraq, a group of senior White House officials not only orchestrated efforts to smear a critic of the war, but worked to cover up this smear campaign. In so doing, they ignored the rule of law, endangering our national security and the brave men and women who dedicate their lives to protecting our nation's security. I. Lewis Libby was a part of this internal White House group.

"This is not only an abuse of power, it is an un-American abuse of the public trust. As Americans, we must hold ourselves and our leaders to a higher standard. We cannot fear dissent. We cannot fear the truth. And we cannot tolerate those who do.

"More importantly, we can't ignore the glaring questions this case has raised about the rationale the Bush Administration used to send us to war in Iraq, a war that continues. American soldiers are still in harms way. Over 2,000 brave Americans have lost their lives, thousands of American soldiers have been wounded, and thousands of American families have made the ultimate sacrifice. Still, the President has no plan and no exit strategy. And still he hasn't answered the question, what are we doing in Iraq and when can our troops come home?

"President Bush faces a serious test of leadership; will he keep his pledge to hold his Administration to high ethical standards and give the American people what they deserve, and will he answer to the American people for these serious missteps?"



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 10:37:37 AM
From: Mr. Palau  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
You forgot to include: Scooter repeatedly lied under oath to a grand jury.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (709575)10/29/2005 11:29:22 AM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The Administration of William Jefferson Clinton is the most ethical in History, and he never lied--so said the impeached, disgraced ex-president himself, and never forget, that all depends on what the definition of the word "is" is.