SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (709598)10/29/2005 11:51:55 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769667
 
It seems to me ms run amok in reporting her testimony creates obvious reasonable doubt that Scooter told any lies under oath or in interviews with the FBI. And for the dim, no lies, no obstruction.

And then it's tim russert's recollections against Mr. Libby.

ms run amok had the plame name in her notes she had forgotten but she said she did not get that name from Libby but from some other whom she could not recall.

no wonder the congenital haters at the NY TIMES now rage against ms run amok, their former heroine.

The above summarizes the case. LOL, it looks more and more a joke.



To: Mr. Palau who wrote (709598)10/30/2005 11:27:27 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
You seem to have failed to grasp the compare and contrast. Clinton lied under oath to a grand jury investigating a crime that Clinton committed. Scooter Libby seems to be he victim of a witch hunt by a prosecutor with a reputation for being aggressive in his prosecutions. Libby is a victim of an investigation taking place for no reason, because no crime was committed to investigate.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News