Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: XBrit who wrote (44060)	11/3/2005 10:13:08 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 306849

Am thinking #76 might be a better way to reduce spending (state), than something like prop 13 (local) which directly impacts real estate. How are you voting on the Nov 8th election? Am undecided for #78, 79, and 80, so do you have any insight on these items? On the others, am thinking about voting as follows: 73-no (this one could be a death sentence for those teenagers with abusive parents) 74-yes (more competition in schools) 75-yes (more competition) 76-yes (eliminates State deficit? - I like this one better than prop 13 as a way to restrict govt spending.) 77-no (probably not a good idea to let 3 retired judges decide what voters should probably decide) 78- maybe yes? though why is this needed since medicare covers drugs? 79- maybe no, probably better if the federal govt handles this uniformly thru all states. 80- maybe no? restricts customers ability to switch utilities. The only one that could remotely impact real estate would be #76 because it directly relates to all types of spending and taxes.