Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (258764)	11/7/2005 1:47:01 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572775

Why don't we restore saddam to power? That's your point. Kerry was suckered to go along with Bush's plan. You met with Ann Richards? lol

To: American Spirit who wrote (258764)	11/7/2005 1:49:17 PM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572775

Why don't we remove the head of Red China from power? Red China!?! What are you still in the 1960's? :-) Chinese haven't been "Red" for over a decade. They the most capitalist folks on the planet these days. And while we're at it, all the various dictatorships throughout the world. I'm with you. As I've said, Burma and Zimbabwe would be good places to start. Oops. We don't have a big enough military. Come on, we could take Burma and Zimbabwe in a matter of weeks once we get troops in position. We can't even secure Iraq with the help of the Brits. In fact we can't even secure 1% of Iraq, just the Green Zone, oilfields and airport (maybe). Its up to the Iraqis to secure Iraq. What was that you said about us needing to invade Iraq even if Saddam had no WMD's? Said nothing of needing to do anything, said removing Saddam was the right thing to do regardless of WMDs. Pay attention! You mean that wasn't Bush's reason for going in? He told us it was. He's doing the right thing (remove Saddam) for the wrong reason (WMDs). My view on the subject has nothing to do with Bush or what he said - unelected authoritarian despots that terrorise their own population and ruin their country's economy should be forcibly removed from power by those that can remove them. That's my point - and it has nothing to do with Bush. What's your point again? You mean we're so concerned about democracy for the Iraqis (whether they want it or not) that we're willing to exhaut our entire military, spend 10,000 American lives and 400 billion dollars? Aren't we nice people. I am!