Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JakeStraw who wrote (258820)	11/7/2005 4:39:41 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573102

Hans Blix: War Planned 'Long in Advance' News24.com Wednesday 9 April 2003 Madrid - The invasion of Iraq was planned a long time in advance, and the United States and Britain are not primarily concerned with finding any banned weapons of mass destruction, the chief UN weapons inspector, Hans Blix, said in an interview on Wednesday. "There is evidence that this war was planned well in advance. Sometimes this raises doubts about their attitude to the (weapons) inspections," Blix told Spanish daily El Pais. "I now believe that finding weapons of mass destruction has been relegated, I would say, to fourth place, which is why the United States and Britain are now waging war on Iraq. Today the main aim is to change the dictatorial regime of Saddam Hussein," he said, according to the Spanish text of the interview. Blix said US President George W Bush had told him in October 2002 that he backed the UN's work to verify US and British claims that Baghdad was developing biological, chemical and nuclear weapons. Washington 'less convinced now' But he said he knew at the time "there were people within the Bush administration who were sceptical and who were working on engineering regime change". By the start of March the hawks in both Washington and London were getting impatient, he added. Blix said that he thought the US might initially have believed Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction - although its "fabrication" of evidence raised doubts about even that - but that Washington was now less convinced by its own claims. "I think the Americans started the war thinking there were some. I think they now believe less in that possibility. But I don't know - you ask yourself a lot of questions when you see the things they did to try and demonstrate that the Iraqis had nuclear weapons, like the fake contract with Niger," he explained. That was a reference to US allegations - later denied - that Iraq had sought to purchase uranium from the west African state of Niger. "I'm very curious to see if they do find any (weapons)," he said. Blix said the war, which on Wednesday entered its 21st day, was "a very high price to pay in terms of human lives and the destruction of a country" when the threat of weapons proliferation could have been contained by UN inspections. By attacking Iraq, Washington had sent the wrong message - that if a country did not possess biological, chemical or nuclear weapons, it risked being attacked. US sending out the wrong signal "The United States maintains that the war on Iraq is designed to send a signal to other countries to keep away from weapons of mass destruction. But people are getting a different message. Take the announcement North Korea has just made. It's tantamount to saying 'if you let in the inspectors, like Iraq did, you get attacked'. North Korea accused the United States on Sunday of using a UN Security Council discussion of its nuclear programme as a "prelude to war" and warned that it would fully mobilise and strengthen its forces. "It's an important problem," Blix continued. "If a country perceives that its security is guaranteed, it won't need to consider weapons of mass destruction. This security guarantee is the first line of defence against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction." The 74-year-old Swede announced in March that he would step down from his post when his contract runs out in June. Blix's reputation for independence and resisting political pressure was sorely tested as the Iraq crisis unfolded and US officials became exasperated with his measured reports on Iraqi cooperation with his inspection teams.

To: JakeStraw who wrote (258820)	11/8/2005 11:10:58 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573102

Democrats Continue To Put Self Before Nation Joe Bell The Democrats continue to waste the nation’s time as they labor feverishly to convince someone besides themselves that President Bush tricked the nation into removing Saddam Hussein from power. They persist in alleging no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq and on November 1 pushed the Senate into a closed session. Your columnists are funny. They should do stand up.

To: JakeStraw who wrote (258820)	11/8/2005 11:13:36 AM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 1573102

Bushies have put themselves above the law and people. Bushies simply do not care about people, period, neither the American people nor anyone else outside their country club walls and lobbyist fundraisers. Time to throw all the pigs out. With extreme prejudice. There can be no progress in this country until Bushies are all driven out of power, investigated, imprisoned and made an example out of. ANother thing, we need tough new laws against smear campaigns, paperless voting machines, voter roll scrubbing and media manipulation. Plus phony terrorist alerts should be a treasonous act. Bushies have put out 7 phony terrorist alerts now, all designed to change the subject from mBush falling poll numbers.