SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (5157)11/9/2005 9:28:42 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542902
 
The committee interviewed over 200 individuals from the intelligence community. They could find no one out of that entire group that indicated they felt pressure directed by the administration with respect to the kind of intelligence they should produce."


It's not that the CIA was pressured to lie about their findings. They probably wouldn't have done that anyway since they are patriotic. It's that the accurate assessments were ignored, buried, and their authors went unpraised. Any assessment that supported the Cheney position was met with a "You're doing a heck of a job ... ", and the information was passed on to Senators and clueless George.

TP



To: epicure who wrote (5157)11/10/2005 11:36:44 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542902
 
I realize that Democrats continue to ask for do-overs when
one thorough investigation fails to achieve the results they
want. Senator Rockefeller & his liberal peers got it after
their baseless whining in 2004.

The March 2005 Robb-Silberman Commission On The Intelligence
Capabilities Of The United States Regarding Weapons Of Mass
Destruction came to the same conclusion as the Senate
Intelligence Committee's findings: pages 50-51:

"The Commission found no evidence of political pressure to influence the Intelligence Community's pre-war assessments of Iraq's weapons programs. As we discuss in detail in the body of our report, analysts universally asserted that in no instance did political pressure cause them to skew or alter any of their analytical judgments. We conclude that it was the paucity of intelligence and poor analytical tradecraft, rather than political pressure, that produced the inaccurate pre-war intelligence assessments."


wmd.gov