SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (5194)11/10/2005 6:27:20 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541805
 
Almost anything the president says, except for perhaps the explicitly personal, or philosophical musings, could be consider to be the president talking about the state of the union. The standard you present would basically be the president can't lie to congress. The actual state of the union address is no more connected to any constitutional duty to inform the congress as to the state of the union than is any other comment the president makes to congress about this country or things that effect this country.

But even if we assume the annual SOTU address is somehow a special specific congressional requirement (if we wanted to make such a false assumption), its nonsensical to claim that there is an explicit constitutional requirement that there be no lies or innaccurate information in the speech, and its questionable to even consider it an implicit mandate, esp. an actionable enforceable mandate.

Tim