SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (259578)11/11/2005 6:29:24 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583681
 
re: It might lessen its focus on us but it might make it grow overall. Also it would show people that terrorist attacks against the US "work", so it might increase the terrorist threat to the US in the long run.

What terrorist attacks against the US?

re: Considering that our car companies compete better with the big SUVs and trucks you probably hurt them a lot. You also cause people to buy goods that they are less satisfied with. While this doesn't directly effect measured economic activity much, it does in a real sense make society poorer, and might indirectly also reduce even measured economic activity. There are also normally a lot of unforeseeable indirect results from intervening for some goods or services and against others.

Energy companies are subsidized up the yin yang, this is hardly a virgin marketplace. 37% of our record trade deficit in September was from oil, what "indirect effect" does that have on the economy (answer: HUGE)? WRT to our car companies, are you suggesting that we continue to be inefficient, with our energy company subsidies, so that Detroit can be artificially supported?

re: And the smallest and least safe, and often not particularly popular despite their fuel economy and relatively low cost.

Screw popularity... it changes with the wind. Getting behemoth SUV's off the road will make us all safer.

re: The lower prices would counteract any benefit from the lowered demand from more efficient machinery. You would be reducing incentives to economize both in the use of the more efficient machinery and in the purchase and use of any types of machinery that are not covered by the scheme.

Crap, give me a specific example.

Sorry, my wife is making me go out to dinner... if i have a chance i will respond to the rest later.

John