Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (713592)	11/16/2005 10:54:53 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That's hilarious. Maybe Haq could fill you in on this. To anyone who enjoys a nice glass of wine, a couple of beers or a mellow Dewars on ice, the claim is absurd. Yeah. That's why there are no bar fights, right? Or at 2 of the local festivals (and 2 about covers the number there are down here) have completely banned the sale of alcohol? If you believe the lying local newspapers, the cops got tired of riots and breaking up fights. Hey, have one on me! Just not near me. Of course a single joint (or just a couple of pipe hits) is excess. In fact or by legal defintion? Because as a statement, fact THAT is hilarious! There is no moderation when it comes to getting stoned. Is this speculation or the voice of experience? If speculation, how can you know? If experience, then you appear to have that "excess" problem you made reference to.

To: Bill who wrote (713592)	11/22/2005 6:42:18 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

That is not correct. <i.If the claim is alcohol in excess is bad, well then, the issue is excess, isn't it? Of course a single joint (or just a couple of pipe hits) is excess. There is no moderation when it comes to getting stoned.