SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (126275)11/21/2005 3:02:04 PM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 209892
 
Mish, Shack will speak for himself, but - imho - if a "triangle" is indistinguishable from an ED -- it's an ED. In a running triangle "B" travels beyond the origin of the triangle, but to expect "D" to go beyond "B" is - I believe - outside the usual definitions.

That said, we all know that an apparent ED may sometimes "hound" - and accelerate in the same direction, instead of reversing. That's why a conservative way of playing an ED is to wait for a break of the support (or resistance) line before entry.

One more thing - and on this one I would appreciate Brian's opinion. One scenario which is popular here among some of us (advocated by MC and some others) is that the point on Brian's chart which he labeled as "A" of the formation is actually the ORIGIN of a "smaller ED", in which at this time we would be in the final wave 5.

That wouldn't be bullish, however....



To: mishedlo who wrote (126275)11/21/2005 3:06:39 PM
From: Shack  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 209892
 
Yes, that has been discussed here mish. Pretty scary bullish thought if that's the right count. In any event I think the wedge will indeed break up, contrary to some of my colleagues here.-g/ng

Tell Brian thanks.