SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mistermj who wrote (175632)11/23/2005 2:32:20 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
And those numbers are just conservative, IMO. Just wait until the true numbers come out after all the millions of papers are translated....

But some people don't seem to care about the people who were killed by Saddam.



To: mistermj who wrote (175632)11/23/2005 6:24:36 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Human rights groups believe about 300,000 people were killed during Saddam's 24-year rule, which ended when U.S.-led forces toppled his regime in 2003."

And in just under three years, we may have killed 100,000! (count from human rights groups)

zmag.org
guardian.co.uk



To: mistermj who wrote (175632)11/23/2005 7:09:10 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 281500
 
So over 24 years he might have killed 300k- which (I assume) includes those killed in the war we (the US) found convenient. Should we really count the victims of the Iran/Iraq war? I'm not sure we should count the war dead- but tell me, you can do the math, how many people a year does that turn out to be, even if you accept the 300k?

Not very many per year, is it? (Not that every life isn't special- but I didn't bring up the "perspective thing"- that was someone else)