Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (262184)	11/26/2005 2:20:21 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573848

Re: "Innocent mistake.......religious and reactionary fundamentalists appear to run your party." There's your second innocent mistake. Not my party. Re: "My attitude: birds of a feather flock together." Then you will be in error, and serve yourself badly, IMHO, as you stick with broadly painting "all" Republicans as corrupt. Re: "If you guys don't want to be lumped in with the corruption and Karl Rove, then stand up and be counted." Here you ask folks to side against corruption they don't believe exists, nothing more. You presume guilt where none is shown. Your tactic is inherently illogical. Re: "You all are a threat to this democracy. In that context, going to war does not seem so extreme." But you are only adopting "aggressive tendencies." Of course, your notion that lefties were never agressive until spurred by the righties will remain a biased minority view. Re: "Nonsense. Deal with your own corruption first before you start determining what's corruption in others." Considering the unconstitutional count Gore and his lawyers asked for from the very start of the little ordeal in 2000, I think you should be talking to yourself there, not me. Start by standing up against Gore's requested counting style. Dan B.