Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (262226)	11/26/2005 3:29:22 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573902

"Asking for a recount is unconstitutional? Since when? Do you make things up as you go along?" Yes, he is.

To: tejek who wrote (262226)	11/26/2005 6:02:54 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573902

I don't know where to start with your incorrect post. How about the end. You say I've said asking for a recount is unconstitutional. I did not (and that you didn't notice, is almost inconceivable!). So you are wrong, but if in possession of a brain, probably just lying outright for the sake of being a needling ass. You can waste bandwidth also, listing all the unproven charges you want, but that won't change the fact that when folks don't believe certain alleged "corruption" exists, asking them to side against "it" or else be labeled supporters of "it," is illogical. Re: "I didn't say all..." Yes you did. "All" a bunch of little Roves, whatever. You've said it more than once, in plain essence, as I've been noting and quoting all along here. No, I didn't imply I belonged to the GOP. You just assumed of your own accord, me having made no statement even close to implying so, IMHO (though I've read plenty of statements implying what I am from you all along). Dan B.