SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Neutral Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Suma who wrote (1617)12/4/2005 4:23:55 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2253
 
Given that the main cause of the flooding in New Orleans appears to have been fraudulent construction of the 17th St. Canal -- if I recall my Louisiana law, statutes of limitations don't begin to run on fraud until the fraud is discovered.

If so -- there may be a deep pocket to fix things, regardless of whether the Bush administration wants to do so, regardless of whether Congress wants to do so. You see, Louisiana law is a lot more generous for injured people than most states.

I admit I've forgotten most of my Louisiana law but if the statute of limitations hasn't run, I don't see any sovereign immunity issues.

The engineers are saying this is the worst engineering fiasco in American history.



To: Suma who wrote (1617)12/14/2005 3:48:41 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 2253
 
thanks suma

and the levee controversy/finger pointing continues:

foxnews.com

actually an accounting of how much money and where it went through the years would be useful

never happen though

I also think the 'high/dry ground' from Katrina flooding RE prices are going to soar

clueless as the what they're going to do with the 9th ward, the buildings are so decimated the most recent rebuild guidlines:

The decision may not be as simple for those whose homes were built below the base flood elevation standards set by FEMA in its 1984 flood map.

Centenio and members of his department have evaluated the city's houses, assigning a percentage of damage to each. In order to obtain a building permit, a homeowner must raise his house to current elevation standards if the cost to repair it is more than 50 percent of what it would cost to rebuild it. The only other option is to demolish the house.



To: Suma who wrote (1617)12/14/2005 4:47:25 PM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 2253
 
Tidwell has it exactly right. It's foolish to repair the levees without engaging in coastal restoration. But we'll take whatever we can get at this point.