SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: slacker711 who wrote (49213)12/15/2005 10:55:59 AM
From: Cooters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197228
 
Here's more on Amp'd from the VC world, most just FYI but the comments bolded at the end seem important.

--

<snip>

It’s been four months since I first began researching and writing about Amp’d Mobile Inc., the Los Angeles-based virtual mobile network operator (MVNO) targeting teenagers and young adults. My original prompt was the company’s massive Series A funding, which totaled $67 million (including the rollover of $7 million in loans). My continuing interest, however, was twofold. First, I believed that MVNOs/MVNO infrastructure would become a very hot VC sub-sector, due to its advantages for both brand-conscious multimedia content providers and capacity-loaded mobile carriers. Second, Amp’d seemed to have the right management pedigree (particularly Boost Mobile founder Peter Adderton) and the right target audience (let’s face it, senior citizens don’t want/need Larry King streaming through mobile phones).

For the uninitiated, MVNO is a term that loosely means reseller. MVNOs buy or lease unused mobile carrier spectrum at wholesale prices, and then sell the "minutes of use" to retail consumers with a device that can access specified content. Perhaps the best-known example of an MVNO - although it's not typically thought of as one - is OnStar, the automotive communications companion that uses extra Verizon capacity. More “traditional” MVNOs would include things like Virgin Mobile or Disney Mobile.

Consider Amp’d much more like the Virgin Mobile model than like the Disney model, in that it doesn’t plan to produce its own content. Instead, it has signed multiple distribution deals with third-party content providers, in an effort to eventually become a one-stop mobile content shop reminiscent of Apple Computer's iTunes music store. It’s Series A deal, for example, included strategic participation from Universal Music Group, while it has since signed deals with content companies like CBS TV, UPN and CollegeHumor.com.

But, until yesterday, Amp’d seemed to have three giant problems: First, it still didn’t have a terribly good branding partner for its target market. Universal Music is certainly good from a pure content compilation perspective, but the brand itself means almost nothing to even dedicated music fans. I once worked at a music radio station, and doubt that I could have matched more than a handful of artists with their respective labels. Can you?

Second, there was the possibility that the MVNO market could become irreconcilably fractured, with every content brand out for itself. Why should Disney/ESPN/ABC license its content to Virgin or Amp’d, when it can sell its own handsets and maximize the margins? Ditto for other record labels, networks, sports leagues, etc. Finally, Amp’d simply didn’t have enough money. Sure, $67 million is a lot of dough for a consumer electronics company, but this really is a national wireless communications company. How fast could it raise additional cash?

So why did yesterday change everything? First, it signed the best possible branding partner for the youth market: MTV Networks, which includes MTV, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, Spike TV, etc. Not only will MTV content/branding be prominent on Amp’d products, but Amp’d will become very visible on MTV Networks products. This obviously will include traditional advertising, but I'd also expect it to eventually include various product placements (“For winning today’s Real World/Road Rules Gauntlet, you win an Amp’d Mobile handset…”). The deal also has effectively blocked MTV from offering its own MVNO, since MTV now has an equity stake and board seat with Amp’d. Why compete against yourself?

And then there is the cash. The MTV deal includes an initial $50 million investment, and this is only the beginning. Amp’d already has a much larger financing set up, of which the MTV infusion is just an opening tranche. A secondary close is likely will occur within the next 30 days (which would include original backers like Highland Capital Partners, Columbia Capital, Redpoint, etc.). If it manages to close by year-end, expect Amp’d to jump from #7 to #3 in terms of the most VC dollars raised in 2005. This certainly will help with product rollout, which begins today. Oh, as an unrelated funding note, MTV Networks now has an Amp’d minority equity stake approximately equal to most of the Series A backers.