Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (7152)	12/17/2005 11:15:36 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541627

The courts will decide whether it was an abuse of power, or not. What he says in his speech is irrelevant.

To: michael97123 who wrote (7152)	12/18/2005 9:46:07 AM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 541627

this was more a technical issue than any violation of law. The law is just a series of technical issues. The Constitution, however, is more than a law. It is the contract under which our country is founded. The Consitution states that a warrent is necessary for searches. Congress and executive orders, and advisors can't decide that they don't want to get a warrent. They can't even pass a law that says they don't need a warrent. They only Constitutional choice is to get a warrent, and that is no mere technicality. TP