SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (16647)12/29/2005 10:44:30 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Former Wichitan charged with securities fraud
Jerry Siebenmark
Scott B. Kaye of Sedgwick County has been arrested and charged with 35 felony counts related to the sale of TrueHedge, an alleged hedge fund established by Kaye, Kansas Securities Commissioner Chris Biggs and Sedgwick County District Attorney Nola Foulston said.

Charges against Kaye, 41, a former Wichita resident, include: engaging in business as a broker-dealer or agent without registration with the Kansas Securities Commissioner; unlawful acts in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of securities; and the offer or sale of unregistered securities.

The state alleges that Kaye sold the securities and then used some of the funds for personal use.

According to Biggs and Foulston, the TrueHedge fund took in $1.9 million.

Kaye's bond is set at $100,000.



To: rrufff who wrote (16647)1/18/2006 2:31:43 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Hedge fund to pay $10 million to settle N.J. case
Posted on Wed, Jan. 18, 2006
Associated Press
philly.com

TRENTON - Defunct hedge fund Canary Capital Partners L.L.C. has agreed pay the state $10 million to settle allegations that it stacked the deck against ordinary investors, the New Jersey Attorney General's Office said yesterday.
Secaucus-based Canary, two of its units, and managing principal Edward J. Stern were accused of trading after hours, when mutual-fund prices are frozen, to reap profits from after-hours events that affect a stock's price the next day.
In addition, Canary and Stern were accused of market timing, or making trades into and out of funds to take advantage of short-term market fluctuations at the expense of long-term shareholders.
"The whole idea of our marketplace is that they're supposed to be fair and open and that everyone gets a fair shot," said Franklin Widmann, chief of the state Bureau of Securities. "They weren't playing that way. They set up a situation where they concealed and disguised the nature of their trading."
Ron Simoncini, a spokesman for Canary Capital, said the company was not commenting yesterday.
Canary's payment to New Jersey is tied for the third-largest ever paid to the state to settle securities violations, said Peter Aseltine, a spokesman for the Attorney General's Office.
As part of the settlement, Stern and Canary have agreed to be barred from acting as brokers or investment advisers for 13 years.
Last week, UBS Financial Services Inc. agreed to pay New Jersey nearly $25 million - the largest sum ever collected in a state securities matter - to settle allegations that it failed to properly supervise brokers who engaged in deceptive market-timing activities.
The UBS payment to New Jersey included a civil penalty of $12.75 million and an additional $12 million for investigative costs, investor education, and other enforcement initiatives.



To: rrufff who wrote (16647)1/19/2006 2:42:32 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
IN THE MONEY: Regulators Say 1-Yr-Old Reg SHO A Success

19 January 2006 14:07
Dow Jones News Service
(c) 2006 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.


By Carol S. Remond
A Dow Jones Newswires Column

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--One year after its adoption, a new short-selling rule has been successful in significantly improving timely settlement of trades.

Known as Regulation SHO, the rule aimed to modernize short-selling rules and to address failures to deliver stock on settlement date three days after a transaction.

Market regulators said in a series of interviews with Dow Jones Newswires that a sharp decrease of the number of companies on the so-called threshold lists shows the early positive impact of Reg SHO. The regulators also said that ongoing examinations of clearing firms showed that Wall Street firms have abided by the new rule.

"Thus far, there appears to be a good level of compliance," a senior staffer at the Securities and Exchange Commission said. According to the SEC, 99% of all trades in dollar terms settle on time.

On average more than $2 trillion worth of trades settle daily through the National Securities Clearing Corp. and Depository Trust Co., two subsidiaries of the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp., the entity that operates a global electronic clearing system.

Under Reg SHO, which incorporated existing short-selling rules from the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD, exchanges provide daily lists of securities with large amounts of failure to deliver. These lists are known as threshold lists. Once a security gets on the list, it typically becomes harder and more expensive to short the stock. In a short sale, a security not owned by the seller is sold in anticipation of a decrease in the stock price. Typically, brokers executing short sales must first make sure that stock is available for borrow.

Some companies have argued that the existence of threshold lists and the fact that some securities stay on them for extended periods of time indicate that the clearing and settlement system on Wall Street is broken.

A few securities, including Krispy Kreme (KKD) and Martha Stewart Living (MSO), have been on threshold lists since Reg SHO's inception on Jan. 10, 2005.

But regulators said that extended stays on threshold lists are not in themselves indicative of any lack of compliance with Reg SHO. They point to a number of factors affecting the number of long-term or aged fails, including so-called grandfathered fails, a number of exemptions granted to stock and option market makers that provide liquidity to the market as well as delays in the delivery of certain types of securities like restricted 144 stock.

"Just because stocks appear on the threshold list doesn't mean that broker dealers aren't following the rules. It means that they are exercising exemptions under the rules," said Steve Luparello, executive vice president of Market Regulation at NASD.

Reg SHO defines threshold securities by two criteria: There are at least 10,000 shares in aggregate failed deliveries for the security for five consecutive settlement days and these fails constitute 0.5% or more of outstanding shares. Fails existing prior to Reg SHO's adoption last January were grandfathered into the system. That means that pre-existing fails are not subjected to new rules that force market participants to close out trades that have failed to settle for extended periods of time.

"Grandfathered fails may be a significant factor in extended fails," said the senior SEC staffer, adding that the Commission is "analyzing the data to determine whether SHO should be revised in any way."

Data provided by the SEC shows that Reg SHO is having the intended effect of clearing up fails to deliver. Through the end of November 2005, the average daily aggregate fails to deliver for all stocks on threshold lists decreased by almost 40%. Meanwhile, the average daily number of threshold securities declined by 36% and the average daily fails of threshold securities dropped by 41%.

"The industry as a whole has basically done a pretty good job," said NASD's Luparello. He said that clearing firms overall have tried very hard to comply with the new rules.

Regulators said that the SEC, the NASD and the NYSE have worked together in developing examination modules to monitor compliance with Reg SHO.

In addition to routine yearly screening of firms for compliance with SHO and other rules, the NYSE and NASD said they have built automated surveillance systems based on data obtained from DTC.

"To the extent our system has generated an aged fail to deliver exception, we will contact our member firms to determine why the position was not closed out, whether it was a fail relating to a market maker or grandfathered position," said Anand Ramtahal, vice president in the NYSE's division of member firm regulation.

The SEC, NASD and NYSE also conducted a joint sweep examination of two dozens firms to check compliance with Reg SHO.

"We were out very early in the process, as were the SEC and the NASD," NYSE's Ramtahal said.

Under Reg SHO, brokers who fail to deliver a security for 13 consecutive settlement days have to execute mandatory buy-in to clean the fails. If the broker cannot buy-in the security, it and its clients will be restricted from further selling short the security without a "pre-borrow agreement."

But in order to balance the need for orderly and timely settlement of trades with the need for market liquidity, the SEC included a number of exemptions in Reg SHO.

In addition to the grandfathering provision which exempted outstanding fails before Jan. 10, 2005, market makers that provide liquidity to the market are exempt from the locate requirement under Reg SHO. Meanwhile, option market makers who have positions in a security before it got on a threshold list are exempt from closing out fails resulting from short selling positions that market maker made to edge the existing position.

"Our analysis shows that a number of the positions that continue to exist (on threshold lists) for periods of time are hedge or arbitrage activities exempt from the provisions," NASD's Luparello said.

(Carol S. Remond is an award-winning columnist and one of four who write the "In The Money" feature. Most recently, she won a 2005 Gerald Loeb Award for best news service content with "Exposing Small-Cap fraud," a series of articles that described how three small companies unscrupulously pumped up their stocks.)

-By Carol S. Remond, Dow Jones Newswires; 201 938 2074; carol.remond@dowjones.com [ 01-19-06 1407ET ]




To: rrufff who wrote (16647)1/20/2006 10:52:10 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Serial plantiff Lazar now a federal defendant
Thursday, January 19, 2006

By Rhonda L. Rundle, The Wall Street Journal

PALM SPRINGS, Calif. -- In his 50 years as a lawyer, investor and serial plaintiff in class-action lawsuits, Seymour M. Lazar has relied on the legal system to make money and trouble.

After his father disinherited him and other family members, he sued the estate. He sued Hertz Corp. for overcharging him for gas, and dozens of other big companies for other alleged transgressions. He even jumped into the legal fight over Howard Hughes's estate, promoting a mysterious will that turned up after the billionaire's 1976 death.

For years, like the fictional character in Woody Allen's "Zelig," Mr. Lazar popped up alongside the famous. Early rock-and-roller Johnny Rivers was a client, beat poet Allen Ginsberg was an acquaintance, and controversial corporate raider Meshulam Riklis was an associate.

Now, at the age of 78, Mr. Lazar is seldom seen. He is recovering from triple-bypass surgery, and his weight has dropped to 120 pounds. And for most of the past six months, federal authorities have confined him to his Palm Springs estate.

Mr. Lazar, long a legal thorn in the side of others, is facing the legal fight of his life. In an indictment unsealed in June, a federal grand jury in Los Angeles accused him of criminal acts related to more than 50 lawsuits, filed over more than 25 years, in which he or a family member served as lead plaintiff. They charged him with receiving "more than $2.4 million in secret and illegal kickback payments" from a New York law firm.

Mr. Lazar's case is intertwined with a long-running federal investigation of that firm, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, one of the nation's largest class-action law firms before it split in two in 2004. Over the years, that firm and its two successor firms have reaped billions of dollars of contingency fees by suing some of the nation's best-known companies for defrauding investors. In the process, they became targets of efforts to stem litigation against big business.

"I swear, they treat me like an absolute thug. I'm not supposed to leave the house," fumed Mr. Lazar during a recent extended interview, his first since the indictment. "Did I hurt anybody? Who did I cheat? Did anybody get screwed?" He added testily: "What they want me to do is hang Milberg Weiss. They don't care about me."

Frail and slightly stooped, Mr. Lazar spends his days shuffling about his Mediterranean-style home in the posh Las Palmas district of Palm Springs. During a lengthy discussion, held in part over lunch on his bougainvillea-draped patio, Mr. Lazar cast himself as a pawn caught between the Bush administration and powerful, corporate class-action attorneys. He did not argue the facts of the government's indictment. Instead, he contested the conclusion that his actions were illegal.

The government alleges that Milberg Weiss directed the "secret and illegal" payments to Mr. Lazar to induce him and his family members to serve as named plaintiffs in class-action lawsuits. Named plaintiffs aren't permitted by law to receive payments beyond those awarded by the courts, to avoid conflicts of interest between them and other class members, to whom they owe a fiduciary duty. Mr. Lazar's financial arrangement, the indictment says, spurred him to "falsely" represent that the fees sought by Milberg Weiss in the cases "were fair to the absent class members."

The government says Mr. Lazar was paid through various intermediary law firms and lawyers, including his personal attorney, Paul T. Selzer, who was also charged in the indictment. Lawyers at Milberg Weiss's successor firms were not accused of wrongdoing in the indictment, but the prosecutors' probe of some partners is continuing, lawyers involved in the case say.

During the recent discussion at his home, Mr. Lazar denied he had conflicts of interest or that the payments were illegal. He said he had taken litigation "ideas" to Milberg Weiss, which paid referral fees to his lawyers, including Mr. Selzer's firm. Those lawyers in turn allocated some of the fees to pay Mr. Lazar's personal bills from real-estate lawyers, appraisers and other professionals, he said. It's not unusual for lawyers to pay referral fees and Mr. Lazar said he had no reason to think the arrangement was improper. Milberg Weiss "gave me part of their fees after the court set the fees and after they got paid," he said. The fees amounted to 5 percent to 10 percent of Milberg Weiss's compensation on some, but not all cases, he said. The payments, he maintained, didn't reduce recoveries for other members of the class.

Lawyers for Milberg Weiss say Mr. Lazar wasn't paid to be a plaintiff. Referral fees, they say, are lawful. The alleged wrongdoing involving Mr. Lazar occurred before Milberg Weiss split into two firms: Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman in New York, and Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins in San Diego. Mr. Selzer's lawyer, David Weichert, said in a statement that his client is a prominent land-use lawyer who "has diligently upheld the law."

Mr. Lazar has long been an iconoclast. He says he made and lost millions of dollars as a securities trader. As a lawyer, he worked on cases with Melvin Belli and Marvin Mitchelson, famous forebears of the modern plaintiffs' bar. He says he hung out with counterculture icons of the 1960s including Mr. Ginsberg and psychedelic-drug activist Timothy Leary, whom he visited at the New York estate of a mutual friend.

He grew up on a ranch in the San Fernando Valley north of Los Angeles and graduated from law school at the University of Southern California in 1951. Before long, he was a fixture in the bars and trendy clubs around Hollywood. He purchased the Cafe Gala on the Sunset Strip, where such well-known musicians as pianist Bobby Short performed.

Over time, his legal practice attracted a clientele of musicians, composers and other entertainers, including, he says, comedian Lenny Bruce, jazz trumpeter Miles Davis and Broadway producer David Merrick. Mr. Rivers, who performed regularly at Whisky A Go-Go, a nightclub near Mr. Lazar's office, became a client. The musician, now 63, says Mr. Lazar helped him negotiate his first recording contract. He went on to record a string of hits, including "Secret Agent Man."

Poet Maya Angelou says she met Mr. Lazar when she was a cabaret singer in Hollywood in the 1950s. "I was very shapely and nice to look at, but Seymour saw more than that," she says. "He knew I was always writing and encouraged me to be more than a cocktail singer." Mr. Lazar says he briefly dated Ms. Angelou and they have remained friends over the years.

Mr. Lazar was driving a Rolls Royce and living the high life. But by the early 1960s, tired of kowtowing to clients, he had lost interest in his legal practice. "I felt I had gotten to the pinnacle and I wanted to make more money," he explains.

He started trading stocks part-time as a client of Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., then a small retail brokerage in Beverly Hills. He made more money trading merger-and-acquisition stocks than practicing law, recalls Gerald W. Demain, a former president of the firm.

Through firm founder B. Gerald "Bernie" Cantor, Mr. Lazar met Mr. Riklis, a financier and corporate raider. Mr. Lazar was eager to be a player in the financial world, Mr. Riklis recalls. "He was a smiling kind of a character and a very social guy, but he was no fool," Mr. Riklis says.

Mr. Lazar purchased a small stake in McCrory Corp., a Pennsylvania-based dime-store operator. Mr. Riklis, who controlled the company, invited him to join the board in 1963, in part to help with a fight against dissident shareholders. Mr. Riklis, now 82, says Mr. Lazar sported long hair and dressed like a "bum" in kooky leather outfits. (Mr. Lazar says Pierre Cardin made him a leather suit in Paris.) On one occasion, when Mr. Lazar showed up at a board meeting without socks, Mr. Riklis demanded that he put some on.

Mr. Riklis says his own financing and takeover activities made him a frequent target of lawsuits brought by what he pejoratively calls "second-story lawyers." He recalls talking to Mr. Lazar about lawyers who earned a living suing corporations and executives. He says Mr. Lazar "found out that it was the way people made money the easy way." Mr. Lazar says he doesn't recall talking to Mr. Riklis about class-action lawyers.

In the 1960s, Mr. Lazar moved to Nassau in the Bahamas to soak up the sun and trade merger stocks. He says he traded through an offshore company owned by his French-born, Chinese wife in order to save on transaction costs. For six years, he divided his time between Nassau and Cuernavaca, Mexico, where he cut a colorful and mysterious profile in the American expatriate community.

In 1969, the Securities and Exchange Commission accused Mr. Lazar of plotting with a "secret group" to manipulate the securities of meatpacker Armour & Co. and General Host Co., a food company seeking to acquire it. In 1975, Mr. Lazar and others consented to a settlement without admitting or denying guilt. Mr. Lazar now says his only violation was failing to disclose a 5 percent stake in Armour, a threshold he claims he exceeded for less than a day.

The SEC action made Mr. Lazar a target for Armour shareholders, who in 1973 filed a class-action suit against him and others. The lawsuit, which was dismissed, brought Mr. Lazar together for the first time with Melvyn Weiss, a founding partner of Milberg Weiss, who was a lawyer on the other side.

Shaken by his encounter with the SEC and by trading losses of $10 million on the deal, Mr. Lazar decided to change his life, he says. He left Cuernavaca and settled in Palm Springs with his family. He says he bought cheap desert land and invested in oil wells in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Louisiana. He played backgammon and traveled the world collecting pre-Columbian and African art. He continued to buy and sell securities, but it was no longer an obsession, he says. His friend Bernard Cornfeld, whose Geneva-based mutual-fund empire had collapsed in scandal, introduced him to actor George Hamilton, who became a Palm Springs neighbor. Mr. Hamilton recalls that Mr. Lazar wore his hair long and "talked in a philosophical way -- sort of like a Zen master."

In 1976, he was contacted by an old pal, Mr. Mitchelson, the Los Angeles lawyer best known for bringing a "palimony" case on behalf of the girlfriend of actor Lee Marvin. Mr. Mitchelson asked Mr. Lazar to help him prove that a document left at the headquarters of the Mormon Church in Salt Lake City was a will written by the late billionaire Howard Hughes. One of the beneficiaries of the purported will was gas station owner Melvin Dummar. Mr. Dummar claimed that in 1967 he had given a ride to a disheveled man claiming to be Mr. Hughes, whom he encountered along a Nevada desert highway.

Mr. Lazar and Mr. Mitchelson helped fund the ensuing litigation over the eccentric aviator's vast estate. The two men, along with several other lawyers who championed the will, were hoping for a cut of what was expected to be tens of millions of dollars in legal fees if they prevailed. But their effort collapsed when a Las Vegas court ruled the document a forgery.

At about that time, Mr. Lazar began working with Mr. Weiss to bring lawsuits against corporations they contended were defrauding shareholders or consumers. Mr. Lazar says he doesn't remember his first case. The federal indictment says his relationship with Milberg Weiss began in or about 1976. That was the year William Lerach, then a junior lawyer at the firm, moved to San Diego to open a West Coast office. Mr. Lazar says he met Mr. Lerach through Mr. Weiss. A lawyer for Mr. Weiss said that because of the pending investigation and the charges against Mr. Lazar, his client felt it was inappropriate to comment.

Mr. Lazar says he came up with ideas for potential lawsuits simply by reading about corporate misdeeds in the newspaper. "I always tell people if I read The Wall Street Journal, I can come up with a class-action a day," he says. He started taking his ideas to Messrs. Weiss and Lerach. Mr. Lazar says he would volunteer himself or a family member to be lead plaintiff in shareholder suits. (Lead plaintiffs in consumer class-actions are not required to hold stock in target companies.) He was not, he insists, a tool of the lawyers. "I brought them every one of the cases," he says. "And I had to talk them into some of them because they're really busy."

In 1980, Mr. Lazar sued Hertz, using Milberg Weiss as his law firm. He had rented a Pontiac at the Ontario, Calif., airport and driven 78 miles to Palm Springs. He returned the car without refilling the tank and was charged $11.15, which he alleged was as much as $2.95 a gallon more than the maximum permitted under federal regulations. "I sued because I believed they were defrauding everybody and not just me," says Mr. Lazar. A judge threw out the case, citing the small sum of money involved. But Mr. Lazar appealed, and the case was reinstated. Eventually, Hertz settled.

Mr. Lazar insists that he didn't file lawsuits to make money but because companies were cheating customers and shareholders. "There were times I had money and times I didn't have money," says Mr. Lazar. In 1985, Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., now part of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., sued Mr. Lazar and his wife for failing to make good on $4 million of guarantees they had made on the bank's loans to an oil company. After a prolonged fight, he paid $3 million to settle the matter, he says.

Over the years, Mr. Lazar says, he conferred periodically with Mr. Lerach and dined with Mr. Weiss in New York. Both lawyers visited him at his Palm Springs home. He says he would explain stock trading and related market issues to the firm's lawyers.

Mr. Lazar's wife of 40 years, A.J. Lou, two of his three children, Adam and Tara, and his mother-in-law have all been plaintiffs in securities class-action cases brought by Milberg Weiss. Mr. Lazar says the family members acted as plaintiffs because the underlying securities were held in their names. (Plaintiffs in securities class-action suits, unlike those in consumer class actions, must be investors.)

The indictment charges Mr. Lazar and his lawyer, Mr. Selzer -- but not Mr. Lazar's family members -- with fraud, conspiracy and money laundering. During many of the years covered by the indictment, Mr. Seltzer was a partner in Best Best & Krieger, a California law firm based in Riverside. The firm has said that it isn't a subject of the government investigation and that it has cooperated with the probe.

Mr. Lazar was arraigned at the Riverside, Calif., federal court house on June 23. "When they arrested me, they threw me in irons," he complains. "The government wanted to keep me in jail forever. They didn't want me to have any bail because they thought I was going to flee. I have all my money here, my art here. I have $11 million in Bank of America here ... Where do they come up with these things?"

That evening, after posting a $5 million bond, he was released to home confinement and ordered to wear an electronic ankle bracelet. Eventually, he was allowed to go without the ankle cuff. In addition to his heart surgery, he has received chemotherapy treatments for lymphoma. He has lost 30 pounds from his already small frame. He says he's still an investor, but not a terribly active one.

In September, he received a letter from Banc of America Investment Services informing him that the bank had "decided to terminate our business relationship." It asked him to transfer his funds to another financial institution. A bank spokesman said the bank doesn't comment on customer relations. "It's unbelievable," Mr. Lazar mutters, pulling from his wallet a gold ATM card that shows he has been a customer since 1953.

On Thursday afternoon, Mr. Lazar appeared in federal court in Los Angeles. He wore a brown tweed sports coat and sat hunched in a wheelchair. He had difficulty hearing. At the court's direction, he was handed a hearing aid. After Mr. Lazar agreed to a doubling of his bail to $10 million, Judge Dean Pregerson released him from home confinement.

Mr. Lazar's trial is slated to begin on April 4.



To: rrufff who wrote (16647)1/24/2006 9:37:21 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
Bawag: Austria's Master Plumber
By Matthew Goldstein
Senior Writer
1/24/2006 7:20 AM EST
URL: thestreet.com

In a shadowy corner of Wall Street where cash-strapped companies go begging for their lives, one foreign bank stands out, both for the scope of its involvement and the measures it has taken to conceal it.

Over the last nine years, Bank fur Arbeit und Wirtschaft, or Bawag, the Austrian financial group best known for its ties to Refco, has quietly become a key player in an obscure but booming market where public companies seek last-ditch financing via private placements of new stock. Known as public investment in private equity, PIPE offerings have grown from a backwater into an $18 billion-a-year financial frontier dominated by hedge funds and other sophisticated players.

Even by the murky standards of the PIPEs market, Bawag's role is hard to pin down -- and that appears to be by design. Austria's fourth-largest bank uses a network of foreign hedge funds and a small New York investment firm to do its bidding in PIPEs, rarely linking its name to any transaction even though its fingerprints are stamped on scores of them.

TheStreet.com has found that Bawag is either a significant investor or controlling shareholder in at least four foreign hedge funds that are active players in the PIPEs market: Alpha Capital, Austinvest Anstalt Balzers, Austost Anstalt Schaan and Celeste Trust, all of which are based in the tiny European country of Lichtenstein. Bawag also has a financial interest in LH Financial Services Corp., an obscure New York investment firm that has sunk more than $70 million over the past two years into about 150 different PIPEs deals, almost all of them penny-stock companies.

In 2004, LH Financial was the second most prolific PIPEs investor in the country by transactions, placing money in 102 different deals, according to PlacementTracker, a research firm. The pace slowed in 2005, when LF invested in about 45 deals -- still good enough to rank in the U.S. top 10.

Bawag officials did not respond to telephone calls and email requests to comment for this story.

TheStreet.com established the bank's financial ties to the four hedge funds and to LH Financial after reviewing numerous regulatory filings and court documents and talking to people familiar with Bawag and the PIPEs market. (For more on how Bawag's activity was discerned, see this sidebar.)

In the U.S., Bawag is best known for its dealings with Refco, the New York commodities brokerage that imploded four months ago in an accounting scandal allegedly orchestrated by its CEO. Bawag once had a minority interest in Refco and made a $410 million loan to the CEO, Phillip Bennett, just hours before the broker disclosed that Bennett had been hiding hundreds of millions of dollars in customer trading losses for years.

But there's another side to Bawag's relationship with the fallen brokerage. All four hedge funds affiliated with Bawag were once customers of Refco, and Refco helped each resell some of the cut-rate shares they acquired in PIPEs deals. Two former Refco brokers who worked closely with the Bawag funds are being investigated by securities regulators on allegations they engaged in manipulative trading on behalf of another entity.

Most of what can be gleaned about Bawag's behind-the-scenes maneuvering in the PIPEs market concerns LH Financial, a 10-person firm with a prestigious Central Park South address. LH Financial, which is not registered as a brokerage or investment adviser, exists almost exclusively to invest in PIPE deals of $5 million or less.

Founded in 1997, LH Financial is led by Solomon Obstfeld, who is listed in some telephone directories as being a rabbi. Obstfeld didn't return several phone calls or respond to email inquiries.

In 1990, Obstfeld got caught up in a government sting that exposed brokers who allegedly used other people to take a licensing exam for them so they could work in the securities industry. Obstfeld, charged with a misdemeanor, paid a $5,000 fine and was sentenced by a federal judge to a year of probation.

LH Financial also has ties to Martin Schlaff, an Austrian billionaire who is one of Bawag's biggest individual customers. Schlaff is a partner with Bawag in the Alpha Capital hedge fund, along with other business ventures. A relative of Schlaff's briefly worked at LH Financial.

Schlaff has his own colorful history. The Jerusalem Post recently reported that Schlaff is being investigated by Israeli authorities over allegations he paid $3 million in "bribes'' a few years ago to family members of ailing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to promote his business interests in Israel. Authorities suspect that some money may have been wire-transferred from accounts at Bawag.

It's easy to see why Vienna-based Bawag, which was founded in 1922 and has more than $50 billion in assets, would want to shield its role in the PIPEs market, given the unsavory reputation the deals have earned and the sketchy backgrounds of some its big players. Critics say PIPEs are particularly susceptible to abuse by unscrupulous short-sellers -- traders who place market bets that a stock will decline in price -- because they usually involve the sale of stock at discounted prices. The stock of a company announcing a PIPEs deal almost always declines as the market adjusts to the influx of new shares and the likelihood that they will be sold for a quick profit.

In light of those traits, U.S. securities regulators have been conducting a sweeping investigation into the PIPEs market for the past two years, looking for manipulative trading, especially in deals involving penny stocks. To date, the inquiry has resulted in only a few enforcement actions against a handful of small hedge fund managers. But more regulatory actions are on the way, including possible sanctions against Knight Capital (NITE:Nasdaq) and Friedman Billings Ramsey (FBR:NYSE) , plus a number of big hedge funds.

One thing regulators are looking for are instances in which an investor learned of a pending PIPEs deal and shorted the issuer's shares before it was publicly announced. Unlike the sale of discounted shares, this practice is flatly illegal, and it has resulted in enforcement actions over the last two years.

There's no indication that Bawag, the four hedge funds or LH Financial are in trouble with regulators. But over the years, a number of private litigants have filed at least six lawsuits raising allegations of fraud and stock manipulation against some of the Bawag-related entities; Bawag itself was never named as a defendant. Most of those lawsuits have been either dismissed or discontinued.

One instance in which Bawag's behind-the-scene activities became a point of controversy is a bankruptcy proceeding for Mooney Aerospace (MNYG:OTC BB) , a San Antonio manufacturer of small, single-engine planes. In that litigation, Paul Dopp, a former Mooney CEO and creditor, has claimed that LH Financial and Alpha Capital never disclosed in regulatory filings that they were acting in concert with Bawag to provide financing to the company.

The bankruptcy judge referred some of Dopp's allegations to federal prosecutors in San Antonio in August 2004. There's no indication prosecutors have seriously purused them.

Notwithstanding the court victories, the Bawag-affiliated entities keep some curious company.

The hedge funds -- Alpha Capital, Austinvest Anstalt Balzers, Austost Anstalt Schaan and Celeste Trust -- were once customers of two former Refco brokers, Matthew Drillman and Jacob Spinner, who were implicated in one of the first manipulative PIPEs trading cases ever brought by securities regulators

The Securities and Exchange Commission has never publicly identified the brokers, nor charged them with any wrongdoing. But people familiar with the inquiry confirmed their identities. The SEC, sources say, is continuing to investigate allegations that the brokers, working at the behest of an investment firm called Rhino Advisors, engaged in manipulative trading on behalf of Amro International, a Swiss hedge fund.

Michael Bachner, an attorney for Spinner, declined to comment on the investigation. Michael Sommer, the lawyer for Drillman, did not return several phone calls. Both men are currently brokers with Pond Equities, a small firm in New York.

Amro is now largely inactive. It hasn't appeared in a PIPEs deal for several years. However, for a time, Amro was investing in many of the same deals as the Bawag affiliates. In at least one PIPE, a financing for Bravo Foods International (BRVO.OB:OTC BB) , Amro and Austinvest are described as having a "common investment representative.'' That investment representative was Rhino Advisors.

There's nothing to indicate that Drillman and Spinner ever engaged in any improper trading with regard to the Bawag-related hedge funds. Still, there is ample evidence the brokers were willing to go to great lengths to please their customers.

In January 2002, Drillman and Spinner wrote a "letter of reference'' on Refco letterhead for Alpha Capital. The letter, which is part of the court record in the Mooney bankruptcy, was designed to persuade officials at the aircraft company of Alpha Capital's good character.

"We suggest that you should feel comfortable in your dealings with Alpha Capital with respect to the integrity of those who speak on its behalf as well as with respect to its ability to perform on its financial obligations,'' the brokers wrote.

In the letter, the brokers also noted that Alpha Capital was "jointly owned by the Bank fur Arbeit und Wirtschaft'' and "a group of well regarded high net worth individuals.'' They added that Alpha Capital was formed by individuals "involved in similar investment vehicles,'' and that Refco had worked on transactions for these individuals totaling more than $100 million.

Of course, writing a glowing letter for a customer is a far cry from what regulators suspect Drillman and Spinner did for Amro, according to sources and investigation documents. Regulators are looking into allegations that the brokers helped arrange a series of illegal short-sales for Amro after the hedge fund invested in a $3 million PIPE deal by Sedona (SDNA.OB:OTC BB) , a small Pennsylvania software company.

The SEC's investigation into improper trading by Amro has been going on for more than four years and is the spark that ignited the broader regulatory inquiry into manipulative trading in the PIPEs market.

The first big development in that investigation came in 2003, when the SEC reached a $1 million settlement with Rhino and its president, Thomas Badian, charging them with "directing a series of manipulative short sales."

Regulators say the shorting was illegal because Amro had signed an agreement not to short shares of Sedona as part of the PIPE transaction, even though the price of the company's stock was expected to decline after the deal's announcement. The deal was structured so Amro would get more shares from Sedona as the price of the stock dropped. Amro, which has never been charged by the SEC, benefited from the brokers' actions because it got a ready supply of stock from the deal to cover the illegal short bets.

But the Rhino settlement didn't end the SEC's investigation. Just as Refco was set to go public in a big $583 million IPO last August, regulators notified the brokerage that it was planning to sanction Santo Maggio, the firm's former president, for failing to properly supervise two "former brokers who handled the account of Amro International.''

Maggio reached a tentative settlement with the SEC to serve a one-year suspension from some of his duties at Refco, but then the accounting scandal at Refco broke wide open in early October. Within days of the revelation, Maggio was gone.

People familiar with the Amro matter say Maggio was aware that Refco brokers were doing trades for the Bawag affiliates. On at least one occasion, these people say, he discussed the trading and payment of commissions with a top Bawag executive. Scott Hershman, one of Maggio's attorneys, declined to comment.

To be fair, Maggio wasn't the only executive at Refco pushing the broker to work with the Bawag-related hedge funds. Another was Thomas Hackl, a former Refco vice president, who joined the brokerage in 2002 after 11 years as head of investment banking at Bawag.

During his tenure at Bawag, Hackl came to know the hedge funds well. His name often appeared in early regulatory filings as the contact person for Austinvest, Austost and Celeste.

None of those filings, however, ever linked Hackl to Bawag.



To: rrufff who wrote (16647)2/3/2006 9:29:32 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Government catches up with hedge funds
As of today, hedge funds have to register with the SEC; some say that provides a false sense of security to less sophisticated investors.

By Amanda Cantrell, CNN/Money staff writer
February 1, 2006: 11:39 AM EST
money.cnn.com

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - After two years of scrutiny, debate and even lawsuits, hedge funds are finally required to register as investment advisers with the Securities and Exchange Commission as of today.

The change marks the first time fund managers in the roughly $1 trillion industry have to register with the SEC as investment advisors, though many managers have already done so voluntarily. Hedge funds will not have to register their individual funds. Rather, they have to provide the SEC with basic information about the firm and also have to hire a chief compliance officer. As part of the rule, hedge fund firms are now subject to random SEC inspections.


The new rule carries some notable exceptions, however: As the rule is written, funds with less than $30 million under management will not have to register, though funds with $25 million or more are eligible for registration.

And funds who "lock up" their investors' money for two or more years or refuse to take new money can also avoid registration. The two-year loophole was meant to protect private equity and venture capital funds from getting caught up in the rule, but some managers invoked the exception to avoid registration.

Harry Davis, a partner with law firm Schulte Roth & Zabel, which represents many large hedge funds, said he doubts that funds would close to new investment just to avoid registration, but it may have been a deciding factor for managers deciding whether to close their funds.

"For funds that were thinking about whether they should close ? that might have tipped them in favor," he said of the rule. "But someone who still wants to grow their business isn't going to close just to avoid registration."

SEC spokesman John Nestor said the SEC is not restricting hedge funds from invoking these exceptions, but he feels that some firms who have tried to invoke it have faced resistance from investors.

"What hedge funds are finding is that big, institutional clients don't want to have their money restricted that way, so if a hedge fund says they want to go to a two-year lockup period, some funds are saying 'Not with my money you won't,'" he said.

A maturing industry
The hedge fund industry began as a maverick, entrepreneurial corner of the high-finance world in which managers could place big, unconventional and risky bets on non-traditional strategies. The most successful of these managers made their investors ? typically high-net-worth individuals ? very rich.

But as the industry has grown up, so has its investor base. Returns have come down from the stratosphere, and managers now heavily emphasize risk management. Those changes have made institutional investors more comfortable ? leading institutional investors like university endowments and lately, public and private pension plans to leap aboard. Because these types of investors often take comfort in registration, a number of hedge fund mangers registered voluntarily to attract institutional money.

People opposed to the registration rule say hedge funds are for sophisticated investors who don't need protecting, and that SEC registration status will give less sophisticated investors a false sense of security about funds, leading to sloppy due diligence.

They also say requiring funds to register would make starting a new hedge fund onerously expensive, because of the costs associated with registration ? including legal fees, staffing costs and other related expenses. Opponents to the rule argue that it is important to the growth of the hedge fund industry that new, successful funds are allowed to form without being unduly burdened with high costs from the outset.

Opponents also question whether SEC registration will help protect investors against fraudulent managers, especially since some of the SEC's hedge fund enforcement actions were levied at firms that were already registered with the SEC.

Randy Shain, executive vice president of investigative due diligence firm First Advantage CoreFacts, which publishes BackTrack Reports, said that while he doesn't think hedge fund registration is a terrible idea, he doesn't feel it will ferret out fraud.

"When I look at industries that are heavily regulated, I see no correlation between them and the prevention of fraud," he said. "Look at broker/dealers ? they're heavily regulated and yet they've given us the biggest boiler rooms. Why would this be different?"

One manager, Phil Goldstein, is so strongly opposed to the rule that he filed a lawsuit against the SEC, charging that the agency exceeded its regulatory authority. Goldstein, a shareholder activist who runs Bulldog Investors, a hedge fund firm that manages about $200 million, through his firm Opportunity Partners L.P.

One of the three judges hearing arguments in the suit, U.S. appeals court judge Harry Edwards, appeared to side with Goldstein, telling an SEC attorney the agency stretched the definition of "hedge fund clients" to make the registration proposal work, according to news reports. The panel is expected to issue a verdict soon.

"What you really have is a rogue agency. So many people give the SEC such wide latitude, but they have exceeded (their) legal authority," Goldstein told CNN/Money last year. He added that he feels a ruling forcing hedge funds to register with regulators should have come from Congress -- not the regulators themselves.

Donaldson's legacy
The SEC began investigating the hedge fund industry under former chairman William Donaldson, who led the charge during his 2-1/2-year tenure to make hedge funds register with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The commission, sharply divided on the issue, voted to approve the controversial rule by a slim 3-2 majority.

Donaldson' cited the industry's spectacular growth ? it now stands at an estimated 8,000 funds and has doubled in size in the last four years ? as well as a rise in fraud cases in the lightly regulated industry.

Despite published reports of a bottleneck at the agency in processing registration applications, SEC spokesman Nestor said the commission anticipated a last-minute rush to registrations and staffed accordingly, which enabled it to cut the application processing time ? typically 45 days ? in half. He said the SEC only has 71 outstanding applications left to process.