Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (719015)	12/20/2005 4:38:18 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Quit lying.... Cutting and pasting things out of context (while conveniently failing to include a link to the source post so people can SEE how you are attempting to manipulate things) is just low... low and phony." The post above is a flat out lie by you. I am going to put each link (the ones you say I left out to cover my "lie") on this post so anybody who would like can read both of our opening posts and see judge whether your current post is honest, or if I am the liar as you state. Now that you are repeatedly and dishonestly calling me a liar, I will let you know that my opinion of you has gone from you being a political opponent with an interesting style that is somewhat effective and entertaining to considering you a dishonest POS. Listed below is the text from 12-16-05 that you are now claiming I am lying about. The link is included. Our 1st 2 posts that started this string of idiocy are also linked below with full text for each post. <Re: "I believe you actually said you didn't miss any factors...." srexley GEEZE SCOTT!!!!!!!!!!!!! There you go again, YET ANOTHER faulty bit of recollection from you, (I NEVER SAID ANYTHING LIKE THAT!)> Buddy's response) Message 21981020 Original posts that Buddy says I am LYING about. Buddy is really lying, as posts prove. Buddy's FULL post to tideglider 12-14-05, link below. <"The economy made a miraculous recovery." Actually, by historical standards, looking at other recoveries after recessions... this recovery is sub-par. Below the average.> Message 21973916 - srexley's response to Buddy on 12-14-05 WORD FOR WORD, link below <"Actually, by historical standards, looking at other recoveries after recessions... this recovery is sub-par." Why do you dismiss the other factors (9-11, corp scandals, internet bubble, two wars, etc) when making such an assertion? Just bashing, I guess. If you guys could just give credit where credit is due you would at least have some credibility.> Message 21974077