SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (152028)12/20/2005 5:01:40 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793611
 
Here's what's important to me:

Q Have you identified armed enemy combatants, through this program, in the United States?

GENERAL HAYDEN: This program has been successful in detecting and preventing attacks inside the United States.



To: Lane3 who wrote (152028)12/20/2005 5:07:09 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793611
 
kholt wrote: I would think you would be just a tad uncomfortable with the notion that the president could do anything he damned well pleased as long as it's under the national security rubric.

I didn't see anybody arguing this. Is anybody, for example, seriously arguing that the President can re-activate the draft and start drafting anybody he wants to into the military just on his say-so under the national security rubric?

Or that he can order FBI agents to capture and hang US citizens without indictment, arraignment, or trial on the simple claim that they are a security risk, under the national security rubric?

I haven't heard anybody arguing either of these, though either one would be included under the "anyting he damned well pleased"



To: Lane3 who wrote (152028)12/20/2005 5:11:09 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793611
 
People have had 20+ years to "internalize" this issue. If they haven't by now guess it's not going to happen.

maybe it is but lots of people haven't internalized it yet.