Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (7738)	12/21/2005 11:00:24 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542058

Rockefeller has certainly not done well in all this. I should have been clearer with that comment, Mary. I had in mind the various conflicts he had and should have had with Roberts since Roberts became the chair of the Senate intelligence committee. Rockefeller has wimped out time after time. As for this particular time, I'm struck by McCain's comment. That if Rockefeller thought something illegal was happening, he should have gone public with it. It's a sticky wicket issue, granted. Since he probably had to sign some nondisclosure stuff before being granted access. But I would guess that nondisclosure agreements are null and void if one suspects a violation of statute.