Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (152357)	12/22/2005 5:19:31 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Respond to of 793559

My question went to the basis for the conclusion that the administration's actions were unconstitutional. Message 21994648 Message 21995462 I was interested in a response in light of the article by John Schmidt, the former Associate Attorney General in the Clinton Administration. Message 21994107 We now have the Jack Kelly article as well: Message 21997740 Steve was apparently concerned because Lindy chastised him for posting articles from clearly biased left-wing sources (e.g., Democracy Rising). Message 21995474 Message 21997725 That said, I don't see why a discussion can't be had over the flat-out statement that the administration's actions were unconstitutional. There has to be an explanation for that. Perhaps the answer is the statement was drawn from move-on.org type sites and Lindy would not be pleased if he cited them here. I shall not delay my Christmas dinner waiting for a response on this.