Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A Neutral Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (1835)	12/29/2005 10:38:10 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2253

But, if he remains opague (so to speak) and reveal himself in some way we do not understand, then God would still be super natural. I have trouble getting my head around that. Seems to me that if something thought supernatural were revealed in any way, opaque or otherwise, understood or otherwise, that thing would have to be recategorized as part of the natural world. If we have, say, faeries who are flitting around unheard and unseen but we feel the air move when they flap their wings, then they're natural. If we have poltergeists, unheard and unseen, who move the furniture around, then poltergeists are natural. Even if these creatures don't create any physical phenomena but merely convey their presence telepathically, they are natural. The trick becomes for science to figure out how they do that and expand our understanding of the natural world to include the phenomenon.