SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jackjc who wrote (3974)1/2/2006 1:01:32 PM
From: Mr. Aloha  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78408
 
It was nice to see MMGG up 22.5% last week on the highest volume since its peak over $3 in Sept. '04, even though it was a holiday-shortened weak and some must have been tax-loss selling into the rally. MMGG here looks like a no-brainer on the zinc opportunity alone, with over $4 billion of contained zinc shown in the feasibility study and a market cap of under $30 million. It's amazing it's still under $1.

Do you see MMGG's silver-cu opportunity as possibly being anywhere near as big as the zinc opportunity? I've focused on the zinc side, not realizing there could be much potential on the silver-cu side.



To: jackjc who wrote (3974)1/2/2006 1:48:59 PM
From: Silver Super Bull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78408
 
jackjc,

I just wanted to comment on the MMGG pp that you have participated in.

At .80 it seems like a gift of absurd magnitudes. Plus a full FIVE YEAR warrant???

I could post a lot of comments regarding this PP...perhaps the most pleasant would be (regarding the PP participants) "You can't say there is no such thing as Santa Claus."

I have followed the stock for a very long time and am currently long...my timing has been somewhat poor on this one.

SSB



To: jackjc who wrote (3974)1/2/2006 2:39:31 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 78408
 
It would have been so easy for Alamos to screw up, maybe spend sparse money early on in nonproductive ways, fail to get financing at crucial points, piss off the wrong locals through a lack of patience ... everything has to go just right, for a project like that, the abyss yawns on every side ... lately here we've been watching a guy from Backeast feuding with a regional board, right next door to a place in which we have an interest, he just doesn't get it, and is not big enough to bulldoze his way through ... odd, because he's not that far off from the Official Community Plan [yes, we have those here, and membership in the community doesn't mean you get to plan anything, either, lol], he basically wants to pave paradise and put up a parking lot, same as a lot of us, quite the opposite of mining, you leave the ground flatter and harder instead of making a hole in it

In the nineties takeouts were the only way for juniors ... or the newly-proven best way, anyhow ... but before that, there was not such a wall between exploration and production, companies did both, drilled off enough to keep two or three years of ore in front of them, and focussed on the net net results ... capex was a lot lower then, proportionately, that's a big part of it - it takes megabucks to get cost per ton down to where you can get it nowadays ... you just don't start up heapleach on a shoestring, like you could narrow-vein highgrade, and even the latter is expensive now ... not everybody can get enough financing on viable terms

The majors are going to have to buy before long, they're not keeping up ... still you're right, you can't depend on this, it's best to keep the whole picture in mind [stump-to-dump, we call it in the woods]

'QEE' - got a few, as qrl.to ... used to laugh at a Queenie follower around '98-'99, he used to laugh back at me for William Resources ... looks like he gets the last laugh -g-

ASM, ORL, SPM, got these on a long list here, of the three Scorpio has the best seasonality effect on its chart, to my view ... might be taking the winter bounce-back thing too far, but it works for me, and is pretty easy, being quite mechanical ... all other things being anywhere near equal [or appearing equally nebulous], i'll take the ones who've sold down into december

MMGG - about three [?] years ago you were defending the otc-bb by pointing out Mines Management, that is now mgn.amex, nice call that one, i had a few at one point ... generally tend to stick to canuck listings, it's simpler and commission is charged in cdn where in US listings it's charged in usd ... which is not a big thing, it just rankles is all ... but yeah, putting Metalline on the short list here

Thanks again for ggc, damn i like that [been into their sedars], it's an exception to the seasonality rule, but there's reason for it ... cheers.



To: jackjc who wrote (3974)12/10/2007 4:47:36 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78408
 
Zinc will have a turn between this coming solstice and the one after, nickel too, and uranium, maybe rare earths ... for now i like silver best, but of course so many of them have zinc and other credits, and things change ... thinking of buying back for my wife her original full position in bmc.v here, torn between that and a couple of others, got mmg to her second biggest by order of cost now

But the post i'm responding to is the one from new year's eve '05, with ten tickers i've made serious money on in the meantime, on one other a small loss but insignificant [asm.v] ... quite the post, not likely to forget it ... thanks jack