SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Stock Picking for Charity - 2006 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Arthur Radley who wrote (155)1/4/2006 1:22:55 PM
From: keokalani'nui  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 592
 
1) Has been done in the past without any outcry of protest.


Not that it would change my mind, but would you please show me where? I searched "short" in the contest threads every year and never found where it was allowed much less undertaken.



To: Arthur Radley who wrote (155)1/4/2006 1:33:29 PM
From: Biomaven  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 592
 
As to the claim that in a bad biotech market this would enhance this individual's portfolio for winning the contest, wouldn't it also be adverse if the biotech markets soars?

Of course. But assume we have 50 entrants all long a random set of a dozen biotechs and one entrant all short a random set of a dozen biotechs. Assume that it is 50% vs 20% vs 30% that we get an up year vs a flat year vs a down year. Then the short would basically have a 30% chance of winning the contest, whereas everyone else would have a chance of around 1.4% (about 1/49th of .7).

Fair contest?

Peter



To: Arthur Radley who wrote (155)1/4/2006 1:37:45 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 592
 
>> with new rules after the cards are dealt <<

It's a "buy and hold" contest.

Subject 54496

All of the rules are written for long positions. There are no provisions for margin or margin calls, and this is a "100% in" contest.

Seems more like cards dealt off the bottom of the deck.

:-)