Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (179441)	1/8/2006 12:08:25 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Which is why I find it particularly odd that anyone sharing that concern would advocate a unilateral pull-out from Iraq I'm not. What I'm advocating is a more proactive examination of a three state solution. Currently it is political taboo to address that, which IMO is unfortunate. I have long considered the US military presence to be a liability in Iraq in so far as many Iraqis are hostile to us, i.e. the problem is largely our own making, hence I would rather see a less partisan force, but realistically there is none available. In the end, we should exit completely, but it would be best if the region had achieved some semblance of equilibrium prior to us leaving. Thats why I think we need to start looking actively at the likely final configuration.