SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (69512)1/11/2006 12:16:27 PM
From: Eric  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 77400
 
To me that's what is really interesting! They are poised for more serious growth with their new product lines coming out. They would only add more sales people to execute this.. Looks very bullish long term.

Checked my broker for more info on analysts reports (you have to pay for this) and I'm enclosing a snippet of one from last month about employee options at Cisco...

"Management: Notwithstanding its liberal use of stock
options, Cisco's management has a solid track record of
execution and corporate stewardship. John Chambers has
been CEO since 1995. Most top managers, including
Chambers, have sales or manufacturing backgrounds.
After forgoing a salary for several years, Chambers' annual
salary was reinstated at $350,000 for 2005. He received a
$1.9 million bonus in fiscal 2004, but it was the first bonus
he'd received in several years. He has typically taken
home a big slug of options each year, though he received
none during fiscal 2004. In 2005, he received a $1.3 million
bonus and 1.5 million options. In total, Chambers holds
about 111 million options, which should keep his interests
aligned with shareholders'. The biggest knock against
Cisco's management is its massive use of stock options to
compensate employees: The firm gave options equal to
nearly 3% of shares outstanding during fiscal 2004 and
2005. With new accounting rules for employee stock
option expensing now in place, we believe Cisco's
insistence on reporting "pro forma" numbers excluding
option expense will create confusion over the coming year
and eventually be looked upon with a skeptical eye.
Cisco's option expense lowers our fair value estimate by
nearly 16%."

I found the above interesting..

Eric



To: RetiredNow who wrote (69512)1/17/2006 9:50:45 PM
From: kvkkc1  Respond to of 77400
 
Two things about that 30% larger sales force. That's a large payroll expense. They better have someone else to sell to, or the revenue per employee goes south.