SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (8718)1/11/2006 1:05:21 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541515
 
When the "enemy" can be almost anyone (in terms of the collection methods you use), and is (possibly) to be found among your own citizens- then those rights do apply. I think most of us remember the Alien and Sedition Acts (reviled for a very good reason)- and we know the founders weren't morons- they understood this could happen. Where the "enemy" is imagined by the government to be in this country, the rights are our protection against the government's "imagination". I think we can see from Mr. Bush's rhetoric just how imaginative he can be.



To: Lane3 who wrote (8718)1/11/2006 1:43:51 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541515
 
So as long as they're doing what they're doing to the enemy, which is what they're supposedly doing in this case, they ought to be able to do it. Those enumerated rights are separate matter that for some reason folks seem to want to apply to the enemy.

But, in there sweeping interpretation, they are spying on US citizens without oversight.

FISA allows that but you have 3 days after the fact to get a court order.

After thousands of years where people who rule have absolute power over those they rule, we have finally obtained some protection on paper (or parchment, whatever).

You want to give that up, because you have George W. Bush's word that US citizens are not being spied on withhout a court order?