Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brushwud who wrote (183074)	1/15/2006 10:07:22 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

I really don't know but I am guessing that this seems to be an agreement to waive NDAs that favor the person who is doing the serving. That may mean that NDAs put in by AMD at a third party can't be used against AMD if AMD serves them. Intel doesn't say they have served any one nor does it say they intend to, so if Intel doesn't serve anyone the Intel NDA remains intact and the AMD one is blown. Cute huh? :))) Again this is guessing. And as far as witnesses being upset, if AMD subpoenas someone it is because they are accusing then of Criminal conspiracy. This is not the same situation if Intel would issue a subpoena, if they have. Cute, huh. Plus, there is something else to be noted here: This is a document request. This is a non-event. For the Droids to be parading this sort of thing around as news, MEANS THAT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IS HAPPENING IN THE CASE. Cute, huh? :))