SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldworldnet who wrote (721901)1/16/2006 4:24:55 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"Human rights would be a better metric than GDP."

GDP is easier to measure though....

(There have long been calls to reform the UN --- or else to invent some *new* institution to take it's place if it refuses to reform --- to introduce representation by ECONOMIC STRENGTH [GNP could be a yardstick for that], and proportional representation according to POPULATION [like the US House of Representatives], so that the whole thing wouldn't be UNICAMERAL and *over-representing* tiny small areas like the US Senate does.)

The Security Council (the security/military wing of the UN, acting with an Executive branch's veto power) could also naturally evolve to add a few more big powers and or nuclear powers....



To: goldworldnet who wrote (721901)1/17/2006 1:37:28 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
What mechanism could we use to limit the power of the small democracies so that Gulliver is not swallowed by Lilliputians? Besides allowing in every banana republic and petty dictatorship, one of the biggest problems with the UN is that every country has one vote. Countries smaller than Rhode Island have the same voice in the assembly that the US and China has.