SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: brushwud who wrote (185258)1/26/2006 2:01:43 AM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Quoting the Inq makes me a hypester?

Besides, given that the Inq talked about QC surfacing in Q106 last June or so, and mentioned a demo at CeBIT last month, and now *AMD* says they will be demoing quad core *at the same time* they intro Socket 1207 / Rev F (well known to be a CeBIT "intro" / April launch ), I'd think you'd give them a little more credit on this one.

I question your unwarranted assumption that a 90nm non-production QC part would only be used for demo purposes.

Consider that OEMs developing QC-based servers might like to have some samples well in advance of a product, and wouldn't much care if the final product was 65nm instead of 90nm.

I would agree that no capacity constraint logic should apply, given the volume of QC parts needed.



To: brushwud who wrote (185258)1/26/2006 5:27:30 AM
From: THE WATSONYOUTHRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Have you or Charlie actually seen it behind closed doors? I think it's patent nonsense that AMD would tapeout a 90 nm chip for demo purposes and only productize a 65 nm version of the same thing.

Perhaps it will be a 65nm demo. They only need a few chips for demo purposes. If the design is ready, I see no reason why at this point in time they could not yield a few chips.

THE WATSONYOUTH