Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (270879)	1/31/2006 7:06:39 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575535

"and we are back to Clinton administration admitting that they were negligent which is unlikely even if someone would videotape the offer......" No, but if you think there wasn't several someones taking notes and generating reports and memos, you have no idea how government works. But, ok. Let's take your thesis at face value. Under what principle or law would the Clinton administration taken and tried bin Laden? True, he was suspected of funding terrorism, but the proof was really thin. Which is why the Clinton administration was trying to get Saudi Arabia to take him, the Saudis did have a variety of laws they could nail him on. Which is why UBL left SA in the first place.