Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shortsinthesand who wrote (2333)	2/2/2006 10:07:27 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12518

Obviously Semco has contracts. No one is doubting that. At issue is whether the PRs are accurate, a criteria for which is timeliness, as in "new", which is why they call it "news"... as opposed to a rehashing of Semco contracts from the past year in a effort to pump up the stock price. But, of course, all this is meaningless "pending SEC approval", which is really issue #1. - Jeff

To: shortsinthesand who wrote (2333)	2/2/2006 10:13:40 AM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12518

He could make that DD more meaningful if he'd stop calling people "liars" and burbling on about "hearsay" without checking the facts first. Now he's claiming he knows the name of the auditors but it's still a Big Secret - more nonsense. He says he has seen it in a "formal filing" and there are none any of those connected with Plasticon except the old Wicklund SEC filings I stumbled across the name of the auditor in a formal filing. Since that time those that harassed me have done their DD and failed to stumble across the same filing. They have been in hot pursuit of the auditor for several months. I will not reveal the name I learned, not because I'm mean or nasty, but because it would be used to harm longs here. If you had been around here more you wouldn't even need to ask your last question. rrm ragingbull.lycos.com