Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mao II who wrote (61888)	2/2/2006 2:15:06 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 173976

You are going to have to do much better than that: "why are you raising this dire spectre: But I would support that before I would agree to allow disruptive protests that interfere with the delivery of the State of the Union Address." Cindy is a goal driven person. Her activities in the public arena are designed to provoke a negative reaction against the current administration. They are designed to draw attention to her protest issues and disrupt the status quo of mainstream thinking. To suggest anything else would simply be dishonest. Unless she gave me a good reason, I would see no reason to expect her conduct to be any different at the Address. That is why people who share her point of view (The potentioal for her to deliver a powerful message) would like to see her at this type of event and why you are so upset that she was excluded ... and to a much lesser degree, as a concern over freedom of speech, which of course gets artificially promoted to be the main issue. You obviously did not share the same concern for Mrs. Young's exclusion. Seems like simple logic. That's why.