SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (271843)2/3/2006 8:43:41 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571811
 
"Certainly designs for nukes have improved greatly."

Yes they have. But a bomb that can be built without testing and/or using information off the Internet or any public information source isn't going to be a whole lot different than what existed 60 years ago. Every country that has developed nuclear bombs, save the US, has had help from someone else or they have spent a lot of time and money building up the knowledge to build the weapons.

People here like to pretend like there is a "Golden Book of Nuclear Weapons" that lays out everything needed to build deliverable weapons. There isn't. Nor can you go to college and get enough information to help all that much. Granted, a lot of the equations about nuclear cross sections and all can be learned in college, but they were known when the US, Germany, the USSR and to a lesser extent, Japan, started working in earnest on nuclear weapons more than 60 years ago.

Other than a gun type, nuclear weapons are difficult to build and take a lot of resources and research. Even if you handed terrorists a perfectly machined sphere of plutonium, they would still be extremely unlikely to build something that didn't just fizzle.



To: bentway who wrote (271843)2/4/2006 4:44:58 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571811
 
Thank you for the excruciating detail. Reading through it and processing how truly horrific nuclear weapons are, I don't see how anyone can be so stupid as to think we should allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. Even if it is a double standard, the world should do everything in its power to stop proliferation to non-nuclear countries and to rollback nuclear weapons in those countries with them.

I believe so strongly about this, that I think a conventional war to stop an extremist government like Iran's from getting them is an option of last resort when diplomacy has failed.



To: bentway who wrote (271843)2/4/2006 5:04:18 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 1571811
 
Re: [Nuclear] Bombs can also be made very "clean" radioactively.

Indeed, like those that were used to bring down the WTC towers on 9/11/01:

Message 22092919



To: bentway who wrote (271843)2/4/2006 11:19:23 AM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571811
 
I believe the largest bomb the Soviets ignited was about 60 Megatons "only" back in 1963 or so.
That was 5 years before the nuclear fall out pMC (percentage modern radio carbon) maxed out at about 189 from index 100 in 1950. It's now back to about 107.

Interesting stuff used in modern forensics to determine the age of human remains in cases where the deceased was born after 1950.

Taro

fbi.gov