Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (272504)	2/6/2006 6:42:52 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574767

"You just don't get it - machine guns are already banned, have been since 1934." No, they're not. tankride.com tankride.com autoweapons.com This one is my favorite: autoweapons.com It's so futuristic! And we're not just talking submachine guns here. You can buy and shoot the big boys: autoweapons.com autoweapons.com You need deep pockets to afford the ammo! All you have to do is pass the standard backgrouond check and have the money to buy the expensive guns and pay the extreme tax, which is sometimes more than the gun. If that's beyond your means, there's always the "illegal", DIY route: guntrafficker.com

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (272504)	2/7/2006 12:00:54 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574767

We agree, military weapons should not be in the hands of civilians. If you think otherwise, you are an extremist rightwing radical out of touch with common sense reality. Also, when I see a single black face amongst the NRA I will begin to take them seriously. basically they are a white supremicist redneck organization in drag. And men who need huge guns suffer from small penis complexes. Also, there is nothing justifiably great about killing wild animals these days unless you live in northern Yukon and depend on hunting for your survival, or you're killing rodents.