Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (272817)	2/8/2006 5:00:39 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575341

Whether you or I agree or not, OBL, his followers and many Muslims see all of SA as Mecca....not just the city. Your links don't support the above claim that OBL considers all of SA to be Mecca. They just say that the two holy cities of Mecca and Medina are in the country of Saudi Arabia. In addition, bin Laden has referred to SA as the qibla of Muslims. I'm sure he has, and hopefully somebody understood what he meant by that because I sure don't! All I am saying is that bin Laden and other Muslims see all of SA as holy.......like Mecca is holy. Well, why didn't you say so in the first place? He attacked Kuwait because at one time, Kuwait was part of Iraq and he saw it as a re-annexation move. Ha! He attacked and took Kuwait because he could. The country of Iraq was created in the 1920s and Kuwait was never part of it. Ever. Kuwait got independence from British control in the early 1970s. If he had taken Kuwait, incorporated it into his "kingdom", the next logical step would be SA. Unless he suddenly became peaceful and his aggressive ambitions suddenly ceased. I think the former more likely.