SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (272882)2/8/2006 1:41:21 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575421
 
Even if we did allow them and gave them a free hand, they are about a decade away.

In fact, Iran's program is so primitive and its missiles and air force, navy and army are so pathetic that the very folks who are saying that Iran is a grave threat now, will be dancing around at "Mission Accomplished II" within a few weeks of the US/Israel starting their air assault of Iran.

The real problems, of course, will start after "Mission Accomplished II". This will be very similar to the Iraq invasion - first the lies, then the unprovoked attack, then the "dreaded" enemy folding up without so much as firing a shot, followed by the gloating and finally, the quagmire...



To: RetiredNow who wrote (272882)2/9/2006 12:35:22 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575421
 
So you think we should allow Iran to have a nuclear bomb? YOu are exposing yourself, Elroy.

I never said anything of the sort. I don't think the unelected leadership of Iran should be allowed to exist.

And I thought it was OK to expose yourself in this anonymous environment where no one else can see me.