Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Alternative energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Big Bucks who wrote (2719)	2/13/2006 2:41:51 PM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 16955

Most of these "economists" in organizations like AEI and Cato are just apologists for the status-quo oil trade. Their economic arguements fall flat on their faces when held to actual economic supply/demand standards. For example, they always mention minor government subsidies for renewables like ethanol, but never mention major government subsidies for the oil trade and nuclear. Oil receives at least $100 Billion per year in U.S. government military protection, probably more these days, and nuclear wouldn't even exist if the federal government did not step in and provide tax-payer insurance for the industry. I think oil would be trading at least $100/barrel without the U.S. government's agressive military policy of protection of that trade, which would translate into a price at the pump for gasoline around $3.75 ($75 oil would only push the price to about $2.75). Nuclear would not even exist as an industry in the United States without the sugar daddy federal government insuring their operations. No private insurer would risk their company on insuring a nuclear plant, even with their satisfactory safety record. The fact is renewables like ethanol are at a competitive market disadvantage due to decades of public policy that have greatly favored established energy sources like oil and nuclear. So, it is not fair to pick on ethanol. Besides, one has to ask if they are taking into account the solar energy necessary to grow the plant from which ethanol is made? That is a lot of energy and by some people's calculations, the solar input makes ethanol a net positive energy medium.