Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (73393)	2/18/2006 12:59:55 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

The steal part of what I said was aimed more at other things that Nader being in the race in Florida in 2000. It had more to do with allowing absentee ballots to be counted even though they did not comply with the laws pertaining to them. Gore would have won if the didn't throw out the law concerning absentee ballots. Then there are little inexplicable issues like Buchanan receiving a much larger percentage of the vote in one county (Palm Beach?) than he did in any other county. He got those votes even though the county has a large amount of Jewish voters. Jewish voters don't vote for Buchanan. These two items are just a short list but there is no sense in me providing you with any more evidence. I'm sure you've been exposed to all of it before and if you still believe bush won Florida there is no amount of evidence or proof which will get you to admit that this is true. 2000 results in Florida... Without Nader Gore would have won by more than he actually did. Libertarian...16,415...Harry Browne Reform........17,484...Pat Buchanan Green.........97,488....Ralph Nader In a way you are right considering your point of view. The votes for Nader weren't wasted in the sense that they are what elected bush.