SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : SI Spammer Hall of Fame -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SI Dave who wrote (1976)2/20/2006 10:36:41 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4105
 
Here's a site devoted to going after junk faxers, and quite successfully. In fact, he nailed a notorious penny stock fraudster this way: junkfax.org

There are large fines for spam abuse under the Can-Spam Act as well (up to $11K per violation), as I've suggested here: Message 22022267

Bottom line is that courts *do* award money for this. Just ask the guy running junkfax.

- Jeff



To: SI Dave who wrote (1976)2/20/2006 11:35:30 AM
From: rrufff  Respond to of 4105
 
I understand that a human initiates the program. It seemed when I used to read RB, that there was a program that generated alphabetical random names, quite similar to what seems to be happening here. RB would delete them and then 10 more would appear the next day. It didn't seem to require any effort on the part of the human who set the program in motion unfortunately. Kind of like an automatic dialer in a way. Just keep at it and hope that enough people see the spam.

I'm no expert in this area but it seemed that the use of names that are letter scrambles shows it's just a computer program and that you may have to work harder to prevent the program from just doing the same thing over and over.

I wish you luck in the endeavor.



To: SI Dave who wrote (1976)2/21/2006 7:04:57 AM
From: Carl Brehm  Respond to of 4105
 
Member 9109363



To: SI Dave who wrote (1976)2/21/2006 11:22:37 AM
From: Arcane Lore  Respond to of 4105
 
deleted



To: SI Dave who wrote (1976)2/23/2006 5:57:48 PM
From: Cheeky Kid  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4105
 
Who on SI would peoplemark a spammer?

Member 4518770

His user level is dormant. I thought these guys got bannished?