Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (58856)	2/20/2006 11:47:24 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 362352

"What if Bush Changed the Game on You?" My 1,107-Word Question to the Political Press By Jay Rosen* huffingtonpost.com *Jay Rosen has been a member of the journalism faculty at New York University since 1986. From 1999 to 2005 he served as chair of the Department. He lives in New York City.

To: zonkie who wrote (58856)	2/21/2006 12:01:54 AM
From: SiouxPal	Respond to of 362352

Good logic. You may now join the "Droid Club For Dems".

To: zonkie who wrote (58856)	2/21/2006 12:52:35 AM
From: illyia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 362352

You can dream. But I wonder about that "Declaration of War" and Bush-League being "The War Time President" angle. If we are not at war, in the legal sense, then Bush Baby's power grab is completely illegal. Adding in Bush, Rove, Cheney, Addington, Libby and Halliburton (left out Enron, Ambramoff, Carlyle, WMD, no-find Osama, and current global protests). To cook this goose define "war" and make it stick. Want to see evidence of "war" other than what we caused in Iraq. An incident, a crime, is not a "war". Because Bush said "we are at war" does he get all power? If so, then one had better define what "war" is and compare current claims against that objective standard. There is an legal argument here. i.