SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (158534)2/22/2006 9:17:33 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793597
 
I have to wonder WHY Bush is taking such a strong stand. Makes me think there is something very big involved with Dubai. One thing I am confident about is Bush would do nothing to damage our internal security. There has to be more to this then meets the eye. jdn



To: michael97123 who wrote (158534)2/22/2006 9:45:53 AM
From: John Carragher  Respond to of 793597
 
i believe this is political in an election year. i doubt bush was even in the loop since normal procedures were followed and i understand even above normal checking was done.

Let look at the flame words.. two guys from their country, and some material passed through it. holy cow!

now perhaps we can hear why they decided to go with them. one thing i heard was they are willing to invest a lot of bucks in new technology where as no one else was willing.

it kind of reminds me of the cartoon in Finland got everyone caught up but the mass know nothing about the details.



To: michael97123 who wrote (158534)2/22/2006 3:10:03 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793597
 
Not necessarily, mike. Tony Snow did some research on this, using his 27 years of journalism reporting background, as well as living near the Pentagon....and it may be not as it seems. I'll be on the lookout for a transcript if there is one.