SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (73875)2/27/2006 12:29:38 PM
From: sea_biscuitRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
No this would be very different from an "Entebbe" type of operation. Since the real intent is to destroy the Iranian oil bourse, a lot of civilian sites will be attacked, in addition to a few nuclear sites. So this will involve a lot of aerial bombing runs. Very different from "Entebbe", which was basically a hostage rescue operation.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (73875)2/27/2006 11:47:58 PM
From: RichnorthRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
It seems you are in favour of an attack on Iran. Am I right?

Now that Iran has agreed to do its nuclear research under the watchful eyes of the Russians, is it still necessary to bomb Itan's nuclear facilities?

Does Iran not have the right to open her oil bourse for trading oil in Euros only? If so, is bombing Iran justifiable?
.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News