Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (278204)	3/5/2006 9:34:29 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573555

Here's one for you. I read in the WSJ today that 9 national airlines from Muslim countries fly into US airports. I read that and thought " of course they do". But......isn't it feasible that "suicide Muslim terrorists" could infiltrate these Muslim owned airlines and do a 9/11 again? Should that practice be banned due to "security risk"? If not, what's the difference between Muslim country owned and operated airlines flying into US airspace, and Muslim countries operating (but not owning) ports, in terms of security risks, that is?

To: bentway who wrote (278204)	3/5/2006 1:40:20 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573555

"Renlistment of soldiers in Iraq is doing rather well. " They (WE!) are paying bonuses up to 60k for certain reenlistments. That's pretty high cotton for your average grunt. Its useless. Tim wants to believe that everything is fine in the Army no matter whether the facts support his case or not.