SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (13877)3/5/2006 11:25:12 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541933
 
Looking Back (and Ahead) With Edwards

By George F. Will


It won't surprise you to learn that I disagree with Wills use of the language of paradigms here. Whether Edwards knows about James Q. Wilson's work here is hardly the most telling point.

It doesn't look as if Will is aware of the poverty studies over the past forty years coming out of the University of Wisconsin and other places. irp.wisc.edu.

Like all serious studies of social issues, the data don't fall neatly around the concept of paradigms. But it's reasonably safe to say two conclusions are apparent. First, when accessible jobs opened up, the poor rushed to get them. And so long as those jobs remained viable, the poverty roles were reduced. Thus, certain kinds of job expansion are critical. And, by reverse inference, their absence explains a lot of what Wills calls "behavior-driven poverty."

Second, when social services such as housing, medical attention, education, etc., were provided at reasonable levels, not the meager levels of the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s. Well, to be more specific the meager levels at the outset and the pitifully meager levels by the end of the century. When these were provided at reasonable levels, the behaviors Wills considered the cause of poverty were reduced. Not at much as I would like but much more than Wills use of the term "paradigm" suggests.

That's one of the reasons Tommy Thompson's efforts when he was Wisconsin's governor interested so many. He drew on these studies. He didn't do what needed to be done but his work was informed by them.