Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (278707)	3/6/2006 5:29:18 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 1572472

lol, Tenchusatsu, that didn't take long did it?

To: Amy J who wrote (278707)	3/6/2006 6:27:16 PM
From: Alighieri	Respond to of 1572472

Tenchusatsu, you do realize there will be a 100% increase in the death of pregnant women as a result of this bill in South Dakota? Mortality rate of pregnant mothers will double due to the passing of this bill. But I forgot, you don't care about the life of a mother. This bill will be tied up in the courts for years...wether that's good or bad. Nothing's changed from today, until the SCOTUS gets around to hearing it. Al

To: Amy J who wrote (278707)	3/6/2006 7:46:35 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572472

Amy, Tenchusatsu, you do realize there will be a 100% increase in the death of pregnant women as a result of this bill in South Dakota? Mortality rate of pregnant mothers will double due to the passing of this bill. The bill makes an exception when the mother's health is at risk. Other than that, are you worried about pregnant women who have abusive husbands? But I forgot, you don't care about the life of a mother. I care more about what mothers go through than you could imagine, Amy. Many of them seeking abortions don't feel like it's a choice. It's just something they feel they "have" to do because to them, society has closed off all of the other options. Tenchusatsu