Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (279108)	3/8/2006 7:14:47 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572605

re: I can see the benefit of having different parties control different parts of the government, but instead of "incremental (usually positive) change I think its often incremental usually negative change. The only possible benefit being that incremental negative change might be worse than a more extreme negative change. So you don't think that the US (and the world, for that matter) has become a better place since WWII? re: In terms of government spending yes... So we agree... the rest of your post was just politics. re: In any case neither Bush nor Clinton (at least not Bill) will be running in 2008. Maybe we can revisit this discussion when we know who the two candidates will be. I would be happy to do that, I wouldn't be surprised if we were on the same side. re: Clinton I don't see how he could say it would either being insensible or dishonest. I know he was a Democrat, but come on man, he did more than any President in your lifetime to get the crap in balance. Quit the partisan stuff and recognize his accomplishment... quit making excuses for the damn Dems and Reps. If you can't get past the false PARTY dogma (and it is pure illusion, as you MUST know at this point) then you look like a phony, a partisan dressed in libertarian clothes. John