SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Return to Sender who wrote (29313)3/13/2006 5:25:39 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95765
 
AMD braces for Intel`s next move

March 13, 2006 16:26:21 (ET)

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Investors seem to think Intel Corp. will aggressively cut prices to blunt advances made by much smaller rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

They've seen this scenario play out before.

AMD takes some market share in computer chips from Intel Corp., only to see Intel cut prices to stunt its archrival's growth.

This time things might not go Intel's way. But investors are not taking any chances.

AMD shares are down 18% since Intel, the world's largest chip manufacturer, cut its first-quarter sales forecast by $500 million a week ago. Intel own stock, meanwhile, is down just 3% over that period.

ThinkEquity analyst Eric Ross said Intel has begun to cut prices for PC chips in a bid to retake market share that AMD seized last year as it rolled out new products. In the near term, he said, AMD's share gains and profit will likely be hurt by a price war.

As a result, Ross cut his AMD rating to sell from buy Monday and lowered his stock-price target to $30 from $50. He had downgraded Intel to sell March 2.

'Intel has lost leverage with its customers because, for the first time in a while, AMD has got a better product roadmap.'

Rob Chaplinski, Bridgescale Partners

AMD (AMD, Trade) was down nearly 7.2% to $34 in Monday trades. Intel (INTC, Trade) fell 12 cents to finish the session at $19.73.

Intel spokesman Robert Manneta said the company "does not typically comment on price cuts." He did add that it is common for Intel to lower prices to help make way for new products.

A processor price list on Intel's Web site, updated Monday, did not reflect any recent changes.

As Intel plays catch-up with AMD on technology placing two processing engines on a single chip, some observers think Intel appears willingly to trade profit for continued market-share dominance. While that would have a negative affect on Intel's fiscal results, AMD, whose sales are just one-ninth of Intel's, might suffer as well.

"Intel is a badly wounded animal," said Fred Hickey, editor of the High Tech Strategist newsletter, who owns put options -- effectively, wagers that a stock will head lower -- on Intel.

That, in turn, puts AMD in "a riskier situation now," said Hickey, who owns AMD shares but has been trimming his holdings after a 157% run-up since last May.

Investors warmed up to AMD shares last year, as AMD bit into Intel's worldwide share of the market in chips used by desktop PCs, laptops and corporate servers.

In the fourth quarter, AMD's combined share of that market rose to 21.4%, up from 16.6% a year before, according to data compiled by Mercury Research.

Hector Ruiz, chief executive at AMD, has said he wants to capture 30% market share by as early as 2008.

With AMD on the make, Intel's combined share of the market fell to 76.9% from 82.2%.

Most analysts expect AMD to extend its share gains this year, albeit not at the same rate, as Intel unleashes one of its biggest product overhauls ever. For its part, AMD claims it will grow at twice the rate of industrywide PC-unit growth in 2006.

True, larger companies tend to grow slower than smaller ones, yet AMD's recent advances on Intel are still eye-catching. Last year, AMD's microprocessor sales grew 48% to $3.9 billion. By contrast, Intel's expanded about 14% to $36 billion.

'Anything Intel does from here is a potential negative for AMD.'

Cody Acree, Stifel Nicholas

If the rivals enter into a price war, it would come as the rate of growth in the PC industry slows. Worldwide PC shipments are estimated to grow 10.7% in 2006, versus 15.5% last year, according to Gartner Inc.

A wildcard this year for PC-shipment growth is the release of Microsoft Corp.'s new Vista operating system. The world's largest software maker has not set an official release date.

In the past, Intel was typically able to cut its PC-chip prices to beat back any AMD advance. Times are different now. Intel is being outengineered, and PC shipments aren't growing like gangbusters.

"Intel has lost leverage with its customers because, for the first time in a while, AMD has got a better product roadmap," said Rob Chaplinsky, co-founder and managing partner of the Menlo Park venture capital firm Bridgescale Partners.

Backed into a corner, Intel laid out plans last week to take back market share. It is set to roll out new PC and server chips starting as early as midsummer.

"Anything Intel does from here is a potential negative for AMD," said Cody Acree, analyst at Stifel Nicholas, who rates Intel a buy and AMD a hold. "It's not that AMD will have a meltdown. It's [that] market-share gains will be harder to come by."

'For me, the most interesting part of my job will be the second half of the year.'

Henri Richard, AMD

In an interview with MarketWatch last week, Henri Richard, AMD's sales chief, said he cannot predict whether Intel will slash prices on PC or server chips but expects "some tough competition" in markets that are "fairly saturated."

He said he does not think an all-out, global price war is in the immediate offing. Watch interview with Richard.

"For me, the most interesting part of my job will be the second half of the year," Richard said. "Intel seems convinced that with more competitive products they can crush us."

Richard, of course, begs to differ. And it won't be until the end of this year or sometime in 2007 that investors will really know.



To: Return to Sender who wrote (29313)3/13/2006 8:45:23 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95765
 
RtS, As usual, you have done a good job in outlining negatives for the market, and providing references for your reasoning. I agree with the concerns you have commented on, and between the 2 of us, I am sure we could come up with a lot more.

However, having said that, I think there are a lot of positives that exist as well. The employment rate is quite low, the general economy seems to be doing quite well overall, and the outlook for continued expansion of chip sales for 06, 07, and 08 is positive. While we have a lot of negatives to overcome, we also have a lot of positives IMO. This "tug of war" between the negatives and positives results in what I would call a "trading market". By my definition, this results in stock prices that continue to oscillate around a slowly moving mean. We do not have much, or any, euphoria presently, but by the same token, we do not have excessive pessimism. The result is a market that continues to stake out the "middle ground" with movement around the mean.

Speaking of market "long term bottom(s) like we had in Oct 98 and Oct 02, I don't think it is going to happen this year. To support that point of view, I first want to present a table that is a combination of previous earnings history along with estimates for the next 2 quarters. Then I want to compare that to the situation in the spring, summer, and fall of Oct 02

The table below, composed of 6 numeric columns shows several things. Columns 2 and 5 show the present consensus estimates for the upcoming Mar and Jun quarters for the stocks in the Group that report on Calendar quarters. Column 6 shows the expected percentage change in earnings for each stock in the Group from Mar to Jun. Note these numbers for the most part are quite positive. The 2 empty columns, 3 and 4, will be filled in as the upcoming reporting season progresses starting in about a month. At the bottom of the table, actuals are shown starting in Jun 04 and continuing on through the quarter ending in Dec 05.

The bottom line estimate for the upcoming Mar quarter is the same as the Dec 05 estimate. In Dec 05, actuals exceeded the estimate by 24 percent - can it be done again in Mar - we will just have to wait and see.

Note that from the Mar 05 quarter, estimates and actuals have been rising at a very good rate. Looking at the Jun 05 actual of 2.13, and comparing that to the Jun 06 estimate of 4.41, rising expectations for improved earnings through Jun 05 are in place.

- MAR JUN
- FISCAL QTR QTR QTR QTR QTR
- QTR EARN EARN PCT EARN PCT
SYMBOL END EST ACT DIFF EST CHG
ASML 1Q 0.19 0.26 37
ASYT 4Q 0.11 0.13 18
ATMI 1Q 0.21 0.24 14
BRKS 2Q 0.13 0.20 54
COHU 1Q -0.07 -0.05
CYMI 1Q 0.42 0.47 12
KLAC 3Q 0.56 0.65 16
KLIC 2Q 0.19 0.24 26
LRCX 3Q 0.62 0.70 13
MTSN 1Q 0.09 0.16 78
NVLS 1Q 0.21 0.28 33
PHTN 2Q 0.08 0.19 138
SMTL 2Q 0.14 0.17 21
TER 1Q 0.20 0.21 5
UTEK 1Q -0.03 0.05
VECO 1Q 0.06 0.14 133
WFR 1Q 0.35 0.37 6
MAR06 TOTAL 3.46 4.41 27
DEC05 TOTAL 3.46 4.28 24
SEP05 TOTAL 1.94 2.58 33
JUN05 TOTAL 1.70 2.13 25
MAR 05 TOTAL 1.25 1.46 17
DEC 04 TOTAL 2.70 2.91 8
SEP 04 TOTAL 4.13 4.25 3
JUN 04 TOTAL 3.49 3.91 12

To make a comparison to 2002, the table below shows quarterly earnings actuals for the Mar, Jun, and Sep quarters. Quarterly results for WFR were available for the Jun quarter only. Note that most of the earnings reported were losses. Adding up at the bottom line, Mar, Jun, and Sep were at -2.66, -1.56, and -1.69. For Mar, and Jun 06, the estimates are 3.46 and 4.41.

- 2002 2002 2002
- MAR JUN SEP
- QTR QTR QTR
- EARN EARN EARN
SYMBOL ACT ACT ACT
ASML -0.05 -0.05 -0.05
ASYT -0.33 -0.27 0.02
ATMI -0.09 -0.03 -0.10
BRKS -0.43 -0.45 -0.45
COHU -0.03 0.04 -0.03
CYMI 0.12 0.18 0.20
KLAC 0.17 0.23 0.23
KLIC -0.45 -0.28 -0.35
LRCX -0.12 -0.06 0.02
MTSN -0.70 -0.58 -0.38
NVLS -0.02 0.08 0.11
PHTN -0.08 0.02 -0.08
SMTL -0.14 -0.13 -0.10
TER -0.40 -0.28 -0.27
UTEK -0.11 -0.07 -0.46
VECO 0.00 0.02 0.00
WFR N/A 0.07 N/A
TOTAL -2.66 -1.56 -1.69

In other words, to get a "long term" bottom like Oct 02, we need a very bleak earnings outlook, not only from the estimate point of view, but also from the actual point of view. Now certainly estimates can change, and sometimes they can change quickly, but we are already in Mar 06 where it is expected that earnings at the bottom line will be 3.46. In Mar 02 it was -2.66. In other words, I think we have run out of time for any long term bottom this year. We presently have rising chip sales forecast for 06, 07, and 08, which will require, as a minimum, level spending for semi-equipment going forward, or as a more likely scenario, an upward spending environment.

Don